Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
Carotid Doppler imaging in glaucoma and glaucoma suspects.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mamtani Nidhi, Baskaran Mani, Patil Trupti S, George Ronnie J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of carotid occlusive disease (COD) in glaucoma and glaucoma suspects.
METHODS: We retrospectively (January 2012 to June 2022) reviewed medical records and carotid Doppler reports of 485 eyes from 279 patients of glaucoma suspects, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), or normal tension glaucoma (NTG) with suspected vascular pathology or unexplained Humphrey visual field (HVF) progression. Carotid artery involvement was determined by the presence of significant stenosis as reported in carotid Doppler imaging.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 63 years (SD: 11.2), of whom 78.1% were males. Carotid artery involvement was seen in 7.4% POAG, 11.4% NTG, and 12% of those with unexplained HVF progression. In contrast, only 3% of individuals in the glaucoma suspect group had stenosis exceeding 10% (P > 0.05). There was a weak correlation between worsening visual field index (VFI) values and increasing stenosis (r = -0.22).
CONCLUSION: COD was rare among glaucoma suspects but commoner among NTG and POAG eyes with unexplained progression and may have clinical relevance only in these subgroups.
METHODS: We retrospectively (January 2012 to June 2022) reviewed medical records and carotid Doppler reports of 485 eyes from 279 patients of glaucoma suspects, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), or normal tension glaucoma (NTG) with suspected vascular pathology or unexplained Humphrey visual field (HVF) progression. Carotid artery involvement was determined by the presence of significant stenosis as reported in carotid Doppler imaging.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 63 years (SD: 11.2), of whom 78.1% were males. Carotid artery involvement was seen in 7.4% POAG, 11.4% NTG, and 12% of those with unexplained HVF progression. In contrast, only 3% of individuals in the glaucoma suspect group had stenosis exceeding 10% (P > 0.05). There was a weak correlation between worsening visual field index (VFI) values and increasing stenosis (r = -0.22).
CONCLUSION: COD was rare among glaucoma suspects but commoner among NTG and POAG eyes with unexplained progression and may have clinical relevance only in these subgroups.