MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2314149

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2024

FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.

Böhm Felix, Mogensen Brynjölfur, Engstrøm Thomas, Stankovic Goran, Srdanovic Ilija, Lønborg Jacob, Zwackman Sammy, Hamid Mehmet, Kellerth Thomas, Lauermann Jörg, Kajander Olli A, Andersson Jonas, Linder Rikard, Angerås Oskar, Renlund Henrik, Ērglis Andrejs, Menon Madhav, Schultz Carl, Laine Mika, Held Claes, Rück Andreas, Östlund Ollie, James Stefan, FULL REVASC Trial Investigators

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The benefit of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease remains unclear.

METHODS

In this multinational, registry-based, randomized trial, we assigned patients with STEMI or very-high-risk non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion to receive either FFR-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions or no further revascularization. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. The two key secondary outcomes were a composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization.

RESULTS

A total of 1542 patients underwent randomization, with 764 assigned to receive FFR-guided complete revascularization and 778 assigned to receive culprit-lesion-only PCI. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 4.3 to 5.2), a primary-outcome event had occurred in 145 patients (19.0%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 159 patients (20.4%) in the culprit-lesion-only group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.17; P = 0.53). With respect to the secondary outcomes, no apparent between-group differences were observed in the composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.44) or unplanned revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.04). There were no apparent between-group differences in safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with STEMI or very-high-risk NSTEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided complete revascularization was not shown to result in a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization than culprit-lesion-only PCI at 4.8 years. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; FULL REVASC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02862119.).

Для цитирования: Böhm Felix, Mogensen Brynjölfur, Engstrøm Thomas, Stankovic Goran, Srdanovic Ilija, Lønborg Jacob, Zwackman Sammy, Hamid Mehmet, Kellerth Thomas, Lauermann Jörg, Kajander Olli A, Andersson Jonas, Linder Rikard, Angerås Oskar, Renlund Henrik, Ērglis Andrejs, Menon Madhav, Schultz Carl, Laine Mika, Held Claes, Rück Andreas, Östlund Ollie, James Stefan, FULL REVASC Trial Investigators. FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.. The New England journal of medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2314149.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.