Investigative radiology · 2006
3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Villablanca J Pablo, Nael Kambiz, Habibi Reza, Nael Ali, Laub Gerhard, Finn J Paul
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We sought to prospectively evaluate the image quality and visualization of the intracranial arteries using high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) at 3 T and to perform intraindividual comparison with time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and multislice CT angiography (CTA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (5 men, 7 women, 37-71 years of age) with suspected cerebrovascular disease prospectively underwent MRA and CTA. MRA was performed on a 3 T MR system, including both 3-dimensional (3D) TOF (Voxel dimension: 0.6 x 0.5 x 0.9 mm in 5 minutes and 40 seconds) and 3D CE-MRA (voxel dimension: 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.8 mm in 20 seconds, using parallel acquisition with an acceleration factor of 4). CTA images were acquired on a 16-slice CT scanner (voxel dimension: 0.35 x 0.35 x 0.8 mm in 17 seconds). The image quality and visualization of up to 26 intracranial arterial segments in each study was evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists. The arterial diameter for selective intracranial arteries was measured independently on each of the 3 studies, and statistical analysis and comparative correlation was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 312 arterial segments were examined by CE-MRA, TOF-MRA, and CTA. The majority of intracranial arteries (87%) were visualized with diagnostic image quality on CE-MRA with a significant correlation to TOF (R values = 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.86, P < 0.0001), and to CTA (R values = 0.74; 95% confidence interavl 0.68-0.78, P < 0.001). The image quality for small intracranial arteries, including the anterior-inferior cerebellar artery, the posterior communicating artery, and the M3 branch of the middle cerebral artery, was significantly lower on CE-MRA compared with TOF and CTA (P < 0.03). There was a significant correlation for the dimensional measurements of arterial diameters at CE-MRA with TOF (r = 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93), and CTA (r = 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.90).
CONCLUSION: The described 3 T CE-MRA protocol, spanning from the cervical to the intracranial vessels, visualized and characterized the majority of intracranial arteries with image quality comparable with that obtained using TOF-MRA and CTA. Further clinical studies are required to establish the accuracy of the technique in a broader clinical setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (5 men, 7 women, 37-71 years of age) with suspected cerebrovascular disease prospectively underwent MRA and CTA. MRA was performed on a 3 T MR system, including both 3-dimensional (3D) TOF (Voxel dimension: 0.6 x 0.5 x 0.9 mm in 5 minutes and 40 seconds) and 3D CE-MRA (voxel dimension: 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.8 mm in 20 seconds, using parallel acquisition with an acceleration factor of 4). CTA images were acquired on a 16-slice CT scanner (voxel dimension: 0.35 x 0.35 x 0.8 mm in 17 seconds). The image quality and visualization of up to 26 intracranial arterial segments in each study was evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists. The arterial diameter for selective intracranial arteries was measured independently on each of the 3 studies, and statistical analysis and comparative correlation was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 312 arterial segments were examined by CE-MRA, TOF-MRA, and CTA. The majority of intracranial arteries (87%) were visualized with diagnostic image quality on CE-MRA with a significant correlation to TOF (R values = 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.86, P < 0.0001), and to CTA (R values = 0.74; 95% confidence interavl 0.68-0.78, P < 0.001). The image quality for small intracranial arteries, including the anterior-inferior cerebellar artery, the posterior communicating artery, and the M3 branch of the middle cerebral artery, was significantly lower on CE-MRA compared with TOF and CTA (P < 0.03). There was a significant correlation for the dimensional measurements of arterial diameters at CE-MRA with TOF (r = 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93), and CTA (r = 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.90).
CONCLUSION: The described 3 T CE-MRA protocol, spanning from the cervical to the intracranial vessels, visualized and characterized the majority of intracranial arteries with image quality comparable with that obtained using TOF-MRA and CTA. Further clinical studies are required to establish the accuracy of the technique in a broader clinical setting.