Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2023
Comparative study of stability between two different fixation systems after orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathism skeleton.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chanachol Pawaris, Chongruangsri Net-Nada, Arunjaroensuk Sirida, Rochanavibhata Sunisa, Siriwatana Kiti, Pimkhaokham Atiphan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study is intended to compare the skeleton stability of bioabsorbable and titanium systems after orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathism patients.
STUDY DESIGN: A Retrospective study of 28 mandibular prognathism patients who underwent BSSRO setback surgery at Chulalongkorn University. Both titanium and the bioabsorbable group would take lateral cephalometrics immediately postoperative in 1-week(T0), 3(T1), 6(T2), and 12(T3) months. These radiographs were analyzed with Dolphin imaging programTM. The vertical, horizontal, and angular indices were measured. To compare immediately postoperative and follow-up periods within the group, the Friedman difference was used, and the Man-Whitney U test was used between the two groups.
RESULT: The measurements within the group presented no statistically significant differences. But this study showed that at T0-T1, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the mean of Me in horizontal linear measurement. T0-T2 found differences between Me in both horizontal and vertical linear measurements, and the difference between ANB. The differences between B-point, Pog, and Me in vertical linear measurements at T0-T3 were also reported.
CONCLUSION: The significant difference values were within the normal range which indicated that using the bioabsorbable system could be well maintained as well as the titanium system.
STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The second operation for removing titanium plate and screw after conventional orthognathic surgery may leads patient discomforts. While a resorbable system might be the role change if the stability is place on the same level.
STUDY DESIGN: A Retrospective study of 28 mandibular prognathism patients who underwent BSSRO setback surgery at Chulalongkorn University. Both titanium and the bioabsorbable group would take lateral cephalometrics immediately postoperative in 1-week(T0), 3(T1), 6(T2), and 12(T3) months. These radiographs were analyzed with Dolphin imaging programTM. The vertical, horizontal, and angular indices were measured. To compare immediately postoperative and follow-up periods within the group, the Friedman difference was used, and the Man-Whitney U test was used between the two groups.
RESULT: The measurements within the group presented no statistically significant differences. But this study showed that at T0-T1, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the mean of Me in horizontal linear measurement. T0-T2 found differences between Me in both horizontal and vertical linear measurements, and the difference between ANB. The differences between B-point, Pog, and Me in vertical linear measurements at T0-T3 were also reported.
CONCLUSION: The significant difference values were within the normal range which indicated that using the bioabsorbable system could be well maintained as well as the titanium system.
STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The second operation for removing titanium plate and screw after conventional orthognathic surgery may leads patient discomforts. While a resorbable system might be the role change if the stability is place on the same level.