Critical care medicine · 2001
Corticosteroids for septic shock.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Annane D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To gather the data to provide a rationale for using replacement therapy with hydrocortisone in septic shock patients.
DATA SOURCES: The Medline and the Cochrane Library databases.
STUDY SELECTION: Studies in animals and in humans were considered when significant data were available about the mechanisms of action of corticosteroids or about their use in severe sepsis.
DATA SUMMARY: Corticosteroids were the first anti-inflammatory drugs tested in septic patients. Randomized trials clearly showed that a short course of a large dose of anti-inflammatory steroids is ineffective and potentially harmful in patients with severe sepsis. Recent demonstrations of altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to septic insult have led to a reappraisal of the use of steroids in septic shock. Randomized trials in catecholamine-dependent septic shock patients strongly suggest that replacement therapy with hydrocortisone may alleviate the symptoms of systemic inflammatory response, reduce the duration of shock, and favorably affect survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence that the therapeutic interest of replacement therapy with corticosteroids increases suggests that low doses of hydrocortisone should be offered to patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock.
DATA SOURCES: The Medline and the Cochrane Library databases.
STUDY SELECTION: Studies in animals and in humans were considered when significant data were available about the mechanisms of action of corticosteroids or about their use in severe sepsis.
DATA SUMMARY: Corticosteroids were the first anti-inflammatory drugs tested in septic patients. Randomized trials clearly showed that a short course of a large dose of anti-inflammatory steroids is ineffective and potentially harmful in patients with severe sepsis. Recent demonstrations of altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to septic insult have led to a reappraisal of the use of steroids in septic shock. Randomized trials in catecholamine-dependent septic shock patients strongly suggest that replacement therapy with hydrocortisone may alleviate the symptoms of systemic inflammatory response, reduce the duration of shock, and favorably affect survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence that the therapeutic interest of replacement therapy with corticosteroids increases suggests that low doses of hydrocortisone should be offered to patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock.