Imaging of aldosterone-secreting adenomas: a prospective comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in 27 patients with suspected primary aldosteronism.
Аннотация
We have compared prospectively the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT and MRI in a series of 27 consecutive patients (age 23-76 yrs, 17 females, 10 males) with clinically suspected primary aldosteronism. We found 13 patients with a unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (11 on the left and 2 on the right side), 6 with idiopathic hyper-aldosteronism and 8 with primary hypertension, which in two cases was associated with a nonfunctioning adrenal adenoma. The diagnosis of aldosterone-producing adenoma was confirmed at surgery and pathology in all cases. Idiopathic hyper-aldosteronism was diagnosed on the basis of the results of dexamethasone-suppressed adrenal scintigraphy and/or selective adrenal vein sampling. MRI correctly identified all cases of aldosterone-producing adenoma, but gave false positive results in five cases: one had idiopathic hyper-aldosteronism with bilateral nodular hyperplasia and four primary hypertension, which in two patients was associated with a nonfunctioning adrenal adenoma. Therefore, the sensitivity of MRI was 100%, its specificity 64% and overall diagnostic accuracy 81%. In comparison, CT correctly recognized only eight of the 13 patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma and gave false positive results in three primary hypertensives, including the two patients with a nonfunctioning adrenal adenoma. Therefore, its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 62, 77 and 69%, respectively. Based on these results, it could be anticipated that about four of every ten patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma would not be correctly diagnosed by CT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.