MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12890-025-03911-7

Медицинская библиотека · BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025

Comparative efficacy of biologics for uncontrolled asthma patients with chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Tsukada Akinari, Tsurumaki Nozomu, Terada-Hirashima Junko, Takasaki Jin, Nishimura Naoki, Nokihara Hiroshi, Izumi Shinyu, Hojo Masayuki

СтатьяСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Asthma patients with comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyps (CRS/NP) often experience poor asthma control. However, the comparative efficacies of biological therapies in this subgroup remain unclear.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on biological therapies targeting uncontrolled asthma that included CRS/NP data. The outcomes of interest were annual asthma exacerbation rate (AER), pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (pre-BD FEV1), asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) scores, and sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) scores. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed based on the presence or absence of CRS/NPs. Subsequently, random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted to perform indirect comparisons of the individual biological therapies.

RESULTS

Eleven eligible RCTs evaluating tezepelumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab were identified. Omalizumab and reslizumab were excluded because subgroup data were not available. Pairwise meta-analyses demonstrated significantly greater improvement effects of biological therapies on all outcomes in patients with CRS/NP than in those without CRS/NP (p < 0.01). In the network meta-analyses, for CRS/NP patients, tezepelumab showed the most pronounced reduction in AER (rate ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09, 0.29), while benralizumab (mean difference [MD] 0.30 L; 95% CI 0.19, 0.40) exhibited the greatest improvement in pre-BD FEV1. Tezepelumab demonstrated the most substantial improvement in the ACQ scores (MD -0.80; 95% CI -1.25, -0.35), whereas mepolizumab (MD -11.80; 95% CI -19.75, -3.85) was associated with the greatest improvement in the SNOT-22 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In the management of asthma with CRS/NP, it is crucial to select biological therapies that consider specific improvements in individual outcomes.

Для цитирования: Tsukada Akinari, Tsurumaki Nozomu, Terada-Hirashima Junko, Takasaki Jin, Nishimura Naoki, Nokihara Hiroshi, Izumi Shinyu, Hojo Masayuki. Comparative efficacy of biologics for uncontrolled asthma patients with chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.. BMC pulmonary medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-025-03911-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.