The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine · 2022
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Removal for Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones in Comparison with Symptomatic Stones.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamaji Yoko, Kawashima Yohei, Kodama Toshiki, Kawanishi Aya, Ito Ayano, Ito Hiroyuki, Ogawa Masami, Kawaguchi Yoshiaki, Kagawa Tatehiro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic removal is recommended for common bile duct stones (CBDs). However, in patients with asymptomatic CBDs, follow-up without treatment may be recommended because of the increased complication risks associated with asymptomatic CBDs removal. The objective of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of CBDs removal in asymptomatic patients.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with naive papilla who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of CBDs from April 2016 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the efficacy and safety of CBDs removal in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.
RESULTS: We enrolled 300 patients, 53 asymptomatic and 247 symptomatic patients. Endoscopic CBDs removal was successful in all patients, except one symptomatic patient. However, the complete stone removal rate in a single session was significantly higher in the asymptomatic group than that in the symptomatic group. ERCP-related complications did not differ between the asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was similar and liver cirrhosis was the only significant risk factor for pancreatitis.
CONCLUSION: Complication risks associated with endoscopic CBDs removal was not significantly different between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Liver cirrhosis was a significant risk factor of ERCP-related pancreatitis.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with naive papilla who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of CBDs from April 2016 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the efficacy and safety of CBDs removal in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.
RESULTS: We enrolled 300 patients, 53 asymptomatic and 247 symptomatic patients. Endoscopic CBDs removal was successful in all patients, except one symptomatic patient. However, the complete stone removal rate in a single session was significantly higher in the asymptomatic group than that in the symptomatic group. ERCP-related complications did not differ between the asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was similar and liver cirrhosis was the only significant risk factor for pancreatitis.
CONCLUSION: Complication risks associated with endoscopic CBDs removal was not significantly different between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Liver cirrhosis was a significant risk factor of ERCP-related pancreatitis.