Forensic toxicology · 2025
Evaluation of blood impurity removal efficiency using the QuEChERS method.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kuze Haruki, Yoshida Haruhi, Tamagawa Hikaru, Nishihori Taichi, Tokugawa Yuri, Yamamoto Fumika, Matsumoto Hiroshi, Harada Kazuo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Comparison of the impurity removal efficiencies of the deproteinization and Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe (QuEChERS) methods, which are pretreatment methods for drug analysis adopted by many forensic autopsy institutions, was performed.
METHOD: Residual cardiac blood samples were pretreated using deproteinization and QuEChERS methods. The residual amounts of total proteins, total lipids, glucose, galactose, electrolytes, and inorganic elements were measured. We also compared the recovery rates and matrix factors when using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS).
RESULTS: The residual rates of total proteins, total lipids, glucose, galactose, and electrolytes using the deproteinization method were 16%, 75%, 75%, 90%, and 91%, respectively. In contrast, the QuEChERS method showed 1.1%, 11%, 7.6%, 9.4%, and 20%, respectively. The amounts of Mg and Mn in QuEChERS increased compared with those before treatment, but other inorganic elements remained at 9.6-89% during deproteinization and 0.30-17% in the QuEChERS. The recovery rate of metformin was low in QuEChERS; however, no differences were observed in the recovery rates or matrix factors of the other 16 drugs between deproteinization and QuEChERS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study quantitatively demonstrated that QuEChERS is extremely efficient at removing impurities from blood compared with deproteinization methods. QuEChERS has poor recovery rates for highly polar drugs but does not prevent their detection. The QuEChERS method is superior to the deproteinization method, considering the load of impurities on the analytical instruments.
METHOD: Residual cardiac blood samples were pretreated using deproteinization and QuEChERS methods. The residual amounts of total proteins, total lipids, glucose, galactose, electrolytes, and inorganic elements were measured. We also compared the recovery rates and matrix factors when using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS).
RESULTS: The residual rates of total proteins, total lipids, glucose, galactose, and electrolytes using the deproteinization method were 16%, 75%, 75%, 90%, and 91%, respectively. In contrast, the QuEChERS method showed 1.1%, 11%, 7.6%, 9.4%, and 20%, respectively. The amounts of Mg and Mn in QuEChERS increased compared with those before treatment, but other inorganic elements remained at 9.6-89% during deproteinization and 0.30-17% in the QuEChERS. The recovery rate of metformin was low in QuEChERS; however, no differences were observed in the recovery rates or matrix factors of the other 16 drugs between deproteinization and QuEChERS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study quantitatively demonstrated that QuEChERS is extremely efficient at removing impurities from blood compared with deproteinization methods. QuEChERS has poor recovery rates for highly polar drugs but does not prevent their detection. The QuEChERS method is superior to the deproteinization method, considering the load of impurities on the analytical instruments.