International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2016
Predictors of tamponade and constriction in patients with pericardial disease undergoing interventional and surgical treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kudaiberdiev Taalaibek, Joshibayev Seitkhan, Imanalieva Gulzada, Beishenaliev Alimkadir S, Ashinaliev Abdulin A, Baisekeev Taalaibek A, Chinaliev Sergei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to define predictors of cardiac compression development including clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, chest-X-ray and perioperative parameters and their diagnostic value.
METHODS: Overall 243 patients with pericardial disease, among them 123 with compression (tamponade, constriction) and 120 without signs of compression were included in the study. Clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, chest-X-Ray, echocardiographic and perioperative data were included in the logistic regression analysis to define predictors of tamponade/constriction development.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis demonstrated large effusion (> 20 mm) (OR 5.393, 95%CI 1.202-24.199, p = 0.028), cardiac chamber collapse (OR 31.426, 95%CI 1.609-613-914, p = 0.023) and NYHA class > 3 (OR 8.671, 95%CI 1.730-43.451, p = 0.009) were multivariable predictors of compression development. The model including these three variables allowed predicting compression in 91.7% of cases. ROC analyses demonstrated that all three variables had significant diagnostic value with sensitivity of 75.6% and specificity of 74.2% for large effusion, low sensitivity and high specificity for cardiac chamber collapse (35% and 92%) and NYHA class (32.5% and 94.2%).
CONCLUSION: The independent predictors of compression development are presence of large effusion > 20 mm, cardiac chamber collapse and high NYHA class. The model including all three parameters allows correctly predicting compression in 91.4% of cases. The diagnostic accuracy of each parameter is characterized by high sensitivity and specificity of large effusion, high specificity of cardiac chamber collapse and NYHA class.
METHODS: Overall 243 patients with pericardial disease, among them 123 with compression (tamponade, constriction) and 120 without signs of compression were included in the study. Clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, chest-X-Ray, echocardiographic and perioperative data were included in the logistic regression analysis to define predictors of tamponade/constriction development.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis demonstrated large effusion (> 20 mm) (OR 5.393, 95%CI 1.202-24.199, p = 0.028), cardiac chamber collapse (OR 31.426, 95%CI 1.609-613-914, p = 0.023) and NYHA class > 3 (OR 8.671, 95%CI 1.730-43.451, p = 0.009) were multivariable predictors of compression development. The model including these three variables allowed predicting compression in 91.7% of cases. ROC analyses demonstrated that all three variables had significant diagnostic value with sensitivity of 75.6% and specificity of 74.2% for large effusion, low sensitivity and high specificity for cardiac chamber collapse (35% and 92%) and NYHA class (32.5% and 94.2%).
CONCLUSION: The independent predictors of compression development are presence of large effusion > 20 mm, cardiac chamber collapse and high NYHA class. The model including all three parameters allows correctly predicting compression in 91.4% of cases. The diagnostic accuracy of each parameter is characterized by high sensitivity and specificity of large effusion, high specificity of cardiac chamber collapse and NYHA class.