European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2003
Effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in non-elective coronary artery bypass surgery: a propensity score analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karthik Shishir, Musleh Ghassan, Grayson Antony D, Keenan Daniel J M, Hasan Ragheb, Pullan D Mark, Dihmis Walid C, Fabri Brian M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Non-elective coronary artery surgery (emergent/salvage or urgent) carries an increased risk in most risk-stratification models. Off-pump coronary surgery is increasingly used in non-elective cases. We aimed to investigate the effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass on outcomes following non-elective coronary surgery.
METHODS: Of the 3771 consecutive coronary artery bypass procedures performed by five surgeons between April 1997 and March 2002, 828 (22%) were non-elective and 417 (50.4%) of these patients had off-pump surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of off-pump on in-hospital outcomes, while adjusting for treatment selection bias. Treatment selection bias was controlled for by constructing a propensity score from core patient characteristics, which was the probability of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. The C statistic for this model was 0.8.
RESULTS: Off-pump patients were more likely to be hypertensive, stable, had less extensive disease and better left ventricular function. The left internal mammary artery was used in 91.8% (n=383) of off-pump patients compared to 79.3% (n=326) of on-pump cases (P<0.001). After adjusting for the propensity score, no difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between off-pump and on-pump (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.83 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.36-1.93); P=0.667). Off-pump patients were less likely to require intra-aortic balloon pump support (adjusted OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.21-0.96); P=0.039), less likely to have renal failure (adjusted OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.22-0.90); P=0.025), and have shorter lengths of stay (adjusted OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.37-0.70); P<0.001). Other morbidity outcomes were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this experience, off-pump coronary surgery in non-elective patients is safe with acceptable results. Non-elective off-pump patients have a significantly reduced incidence of renal failure, and shorter post-operative stays compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
METHODS: Of the 3771 consecutive coronary artery bypass procedures performed by five surgeons between April 1997 and March 2002, 828 (22%) were non-elective and 417 (50.4%) of these patients had off-pump surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of off-pump on in-hospital outcomes, while adjusting for treatment selection bias. Treatment selection bias was controlled for by constructing a propensity score from core patient characteristics, which was the probability of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. The C statistic for this model was 0.8.
RESULTS: Off-pump patients were more likely to be hypertensive, stable, had less extensive disease and better left ventricular function. The left internal mammary artery was used in 91.8% (n=383) of off-pump patients compared to 79.3% (n=326) of on-pump cases (P<0.001). After adjusting for the propensity score, no difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between off-pump and on-pump (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.83 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.36-1.93); P=0.667). Off-pump patients were less likely to require intra-aortic balloon pump support (adjusted OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.21-0.96); P=0.039), less likely to have renal failure (adjusted OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.22-0.90); P=0.025), and have shorter lengths of stay (adjusted OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.37-0.70); P<0.001). Other morbidity outcomes were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this experience, off-pump coronary surgery in non-elective patients is safe with acceptable results. Non-elective off-pump patients have a significantly reduced incidence of renal failure, and shorter post-operative stays compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.