MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.007

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery open science · 2024

Comparison of two methods: Clipping and suturing in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Farahani Parham Khoshdani, Safaei Neda

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Closure of the appendix stump after appendectomy is considered one of the most important parts of laparoscopic appendectomy. Various techniques are used during this surgery, commonly including endoclips and ligatures. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare endoclips with intra-corporeal ligatures in closing the appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using data from 50 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy. The data from patients whose stumps were closed using endoclips in 25 patients (Group I) and with intra-corporeal ligatures in 25 patients (Group II) were extracted and compared regarding the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the two methods in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The duration of surgery in the ligature group was significantly longer than in the clip group (p = 0.044). The hospital stay duration was clinically longer in the ligature group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endoclips for closing the appendix stump are safer with a shorter operating time and also a simpler method. Therefore, they could be a reliable alternative to the method of closing the appendix stump with ligatures.

Для цитирования: Farahani Parham Khoshdani, Safaei Neda. Comparison of two methods: Clipping and suturing in laparoscopic appendectomy.. Surgery open science. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.007.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.