MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318222720e

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care medicine · 2011

Agreement in electrocardiogram interpretation in patients with septic shock.

Mehta Sangeeta, Granton John, Lapinsky Stephen E, Newton Gary, Bandayrel Kristofer, Little Anjuli, Siau Chuin, Cook Deborah J, Ayers Dieter, Singer Joel, Lee Terry C, Walley Keith R, Storms Michelle, Cooper Jamie, Holmes Cheryl L, Hebert Paul, Gordon Anthony C, Presneill Jeff, Russell James A, Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST) Investigators

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The reliability of electrocardiogram interpretation to diagnose myocardial ischemia in critically ill patients is unclear. In adults with septic shock, we assessed intra- and inter-rater agreement of electrocardiogram interpretation, and the effect of knowledge of troponin values on these interpretations.

DESIGN

Prospective substudy of a randomized trial of vasopressin vs. norepinephrine in septic shock.

SETTING

Nine Canadian intensive care units.

PATIENTS: Adults with septic shock requiring at least 5 μg/min of norepinephrine for 6 hrs.

INTERVENTIONS: Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were recorded before study drug, and 6 hrs, 2 days, and 4 days after study drug initiation.

MEASUREMENTS: Two physician readers, blinded to patient data and group, independently interpreted electrocardiograms on three occasions (first two readings were blinded to patient data; third reading was unblinded to troponin). To calibrate and refine definitions, both readers initially reviewed 25 trial electrocardiograms representing normal to abnormal. Cohen's Kappa and the φ statistic were used to analyze intra- and inter-rater agreement.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one patients (62.2 ± 16.5 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 28.6 ± 7.7) had 373 electrocardiograms. Blinded to troponin, readers 1 and 2 interpreted 46.4% and 30.0% of electrocardiograms as normal, and 15.3% and 12.3% as ischemic, respectively. Intrarater agreement was moderate for overall ischemia (κ 0.54 and 0.58), moderate/good for "normal" (κ 0.69 and 0.55), fair to good for specific signs of ischemia (ST elevation, T inversion, and Q waves, reader 1 κ 0.40 to 0.69; reader 2 κ 0.56 to 0.70); and good/very good for atrial arrhythmias (κ 0.84 and 0.79) and bundle branch block (κ 0.88 and 0.79). Inter-rater agreement was fair for ischemia (κ 0.29), moderate for ST elevation (κ 0.48), T inversion (κ 0.52), and Q waves (κ 0.44), good for bundle branch block (κ 0.78), and very good for atrial arrhythmias (κ 0.83). Inter-rater agreement for ischemia improved from fair to moderate (κ 0.52, p = .028) when unblinded to troponin.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with septic shock, inter-rater agreement of electrocardiogram interpretation for myocardial ischemia was fair, and improved with troponin knowledge.

Для цитирования: Mehta Sangeeta, Granton John, Lapinsky Stephen E, Newton Gary, Bandayrel Kristofer, Little Anjuli, Siau Chuin, Cook Deborah J, Ayers Dieter, Singer Joel, Lee Terry C, Walley Keith R, Storms Michelle, Cooper Jamie, Holmes Cheryl L, Hebert Paul, Gordon Anthony C, Presneill Jeff, Russell James A, Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST) Investigators. Agreement in electrocardiogram interpretation in patients with septic shock.. Critical care medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318222720e.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.