Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2011
Atrioventricular conduction disturbance characterization in transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rubín José M, Avanzas Pablo, del Valle Raquel, Renilla Alfredo, Ríos Enrique, Calvo David, Lozano Iñigo, Anguera Ignasi, Díaz-Molina Beatriz, Cequier Angel, Morís de la Tassa César
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) block is one of the most frequent complications of CoreValve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of CoreValve implantation on AV conduction.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrophysiological study was performed immediately before and after CoreValve implantation in 18 consecutive, permanent pacemaker-free patients. An electrode was placed on the His bundle during valve implantation, and data were continuously recorded during the procedure. With surface ECG, a median (first, third quartile) QRS width of 96 (84, 116) to 150 (121, 164) ms (P=0.001) and PR interval of 180 (159, 216) to 210 (190, 240) ms (P=0.008) were significantly prolonged, and QRS axis was left deviated 30° (-32°, 46°) to -20° (-60°, 2°) (P=0.005). With intracardiac electrograms, the AH (97 [70, 123] to 115 [96, 135] ms, P=0.021) and HV (52 [42, 55] to 60 [50, 70] ms, P=0.002) intervals were increased. At the end of the procedure, we observed significant ECG- or electrophysiological study-persistent conduction disturbances in 14 (78%) patients. Five patients experienced transient changes (2 AV blocks and 3 left bundle branch blocks).
CONCLUSIONS: CoreValve implantation worsens AV conduction in most patients, either transiently or permanently. This worsening is the result of direct damage either on the His bundle or on the AV node.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrophysiological study was performed immediately before and after CoreValve implantation in 18 consecutive, permanent pacemaker-free patients. An electrode was placed on the His bundle during valve implantation, and data were continuously recorded during the procedure. With surface ECG, a median (first, third quartile) QRS width of 96 (84, 116) to 150 (121, 164) ms (P=0.001) and PR interval of 180 (159, 216) to 210 (190, 240) ms (P=0.008) were significantly prolonged, and QRS axis was left deviated 30° (-32°, 46°) to -20° (-60°, 2°) (P=0.005). With intracardiac electrograms, the AH (97 [70, 123] to 115 [96, 135] ms, P=0.021) and HV (52 [42, 55] to 60 [50, 70] ms, P=0.002) intervals were increased. At the end of the procedure, we observed significant ECG- or electrophysiological study-persistent conduction disturbances in 14 (78%) patients. Five patients experienced transient changes (2 AV blocks and 3 left bundle branch blocks).
CONCLUSIONS: CoreValve implantation worsens AV conduction in most patients, either transiently or permanently. This worsening is the result of direct damage either on the His bundle or on the AV node.