Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2023
Feasibility Testing of a Web-Based Reproductive Decision Support Tool for Cystic Fibrosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kazmerski Traci M, Stransky Olivia M, Wright Catherine E, Albanowski Maya, Pilewski Joseph M, Talabi Mehret Birru, Callegari Lisa S, Chang Judy C, Abebe Kaleab Z, Miller Elizabeth, Deal Ashley, O'Leary Raelynn, Borrero Sonya
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: People with cystic fibrosis (CF) are increasingly considering their reproductive goals. We developed MyVoice:CF, a web-based patient-centered reproductive decision support tool and assessed its implementation in CF care.
METHODS: We conducted a feasibility trial among 18-44-year-old women with CF and multidisciplinary CF providers. Prior to CF clinic visit, patient participants completed a baseline survey, used MyVoice:CF, and assessed acceptability, appropriateness, and usability. After clinic, participants rated impact on reproductive health communication. At 3 months post-use, participants assessed impact on reproductive health outcomes. Provider participants completed a survey and focus group regarding MyVoice:CF feasibility/implementation. We assessed outcomes descriptively. We compared MyVoice:CF's impact on outcomes from baseline to follow-up using McNemar's and Wilcoxon signed rank tests as appropriate.
RESULTS: Forty-three patient participants completed baseline surveys and 40 rated MyVoice:CF's feasibility; 10 providers participated. Patient participants rated MyVoice:CF's acceptability as 4.48±0.50 out of 5, appropriateness as 4.61±0.48 out of 5, and usability as 82.25±11.02 ('A'/excellent). After MyVoice:CF use, participants reported improved reproductive health communication self-efficacy vs. baseline (3.54±1.17vs.3.95±0.93, p<0.001). At baseline, 36% of participants reported any discussion of reproductive goals/plans with their CF team in the past year compared to 59% after first visit post-MyVoice:CF use (p=0.049). Provider participants similarly rated MyVoice:CF as feasible and reported no negative impacts on clinic flow after implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: MyVoice:CF is acceptable, appropriate, and usable for those with CF. Preliminary effectiveness evaluation suggests that MyVoice:CF improves self-efficacy in and frequency of reproductive health communication. Future studies should further assess MyVoice:CF's impact on reproductive health communication and outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a feasibility trial among 18-44-year-old women with CF and multidisciplinary CF providers. Prior to CF clinic visit, patient participants completed a baseline survey, used MyVoice:CF, and assessed acceptability, appropriateness, and usability. After clinic, participants rated impact on reproductive health communication. At 3 months post-use, participants assessed impact on reproductive health outcomes. Provider participants completed a survey and focus group regarding MyVoice:CF feasibility/implementation. We assessed outcomes descriptively. We compared MyVoice:CF's impact on outcomes from baseline to follow-up using McNemar's and Wilcoxon signed rank tests as appropriate.
RESULTS: Forty-three patient participants completed baseline surveys and 40 rated MyVoice:CF's feasibility; 10 providers participated. Patient participants rated MyVoice:CF's acceptability as 4.48±0.50 out of 5, appropriateness as 4.61±0.48 out of 5, and usability as 82.25±11.02 ('A'/excellent). After MyVoice:CF use, participants reported improved reproductive health communication self-efficacy vs. baseline (3.54±1.17vs.3.95±0.93, p<0.001). At baseline, 36% of participants reported any discussion of reproductive goals/plans with their CF team in the past year compared to 59% after first visit post-MyVoice:CF use (p=0.049). Provider participants similarly rated MyVoice:CF as feasible and reported no negative impacts on clinic flow after implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: MyVoice:CF is acceptable, appropriate, and usable for those with CF. Preliminary effectiveness evaluation suggests that MyVoice:CF improves self-efficacy in and frequency of reproductive health communication. Future studies should further assess MyVoice:CF's impact on reproductive health communication and outcomes.