MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00313

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of internal medicine · 2011

Meta-analysis: cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with less symptomatic heart failure.

Al-Majed Nawaf S, McAlister Finlay A, Bakal Jeffrey A, Ezekowitz Justin A

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced symptoms of heart failure.

PURPOSE: To assess the benefits and harms of CRT in patients with advanced heart failure and those with less symptomatic disease.

DATA SOURCES: A search of electronic databases (1950 to December 2010), hand-searching of reference lists, and unpublished data from principal investigators. Searches were not limited to the English language.

STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials of CRT compared with usual care and right or left ventricular pacing in adults with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or less.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers performed independent study selection, data abstraction, and quality assessment by using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk for bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS: There were 9082 patients in 25 trials. In patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I and II symptoms, CRT reduced all-cause mortality (6 trials, 4572 participants; risk ratio [RR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.96]) and heart failure hospitalizations (4 trials, 4349 participants; RR, 0.71 [CI, 0.57 to 0.87]) without improving functional outcomes or quality of life. In patients with NYHA class III or IV symptoms, CRT improved functional outcomes and reduced both all-cause mortality (19 trials, 4510 participants; RR, 0.78 [CI, 0.67 to 0.91]) and heart failure hospitalizations (11 trials, 2663 participants; RR, 0.65 [CI, 0.50 to 0.86]). The implant success rate was 94.4%; peri-implantation deaths occurred in 0.3% of trial participants, mechanical complications in 3.2%, lead problems in 6.2%, and infections in 1.4%.

LIMITATION: Subgroup analyses were underpowered and lack data for persons with NYHA class I symptoms, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, or right bundle branch block.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, symptoms of heart failure, and prolonged QRS, regardless of NYHA class.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Для цитирования: Al-Majed Nawaf S, McAlister Finlay A, Bakal Jeffrey A, Ezekowitz Justin A. Meta-analysis: cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with less symptomatic heart failure.. Annals of internal medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00313.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.