Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2016
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of voriconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive aspergillosis in high-risk liver transplant recipients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Balogh Julius, Gordon Burroughs Sherilyn, Boktour Maha, Patel Samir, Saharia Ashish, Ochoa Robert A, McFadden Robert, Victor David W, Ankoma-Sey Victor, Galati Joseph, Monsour Howard P, Fainstein Victor, Li Xian C, Grimes Kevin A, Gaber A Osama, Aloia Thomas, Ghobrial R Mark
Аннотация
Aspergillus infection remains a significant and deadly complication after liver transplantation (LT). We sought to determine whether the antifungal prophylactic use of voriconazole reduces the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in high-risk LT recipients without prohibitively increasing cost. During the study era (April 2008 to April 2014), 339 deceased donor LTs were performed. Of those patients, 174 high-risk recipients were administered antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole. The median biological Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at the time of LT was 33 (range, 18-49) with 56% requiring continuous renal replacement therapy and 50% requiring ventilatory support immediately before transplantation. Diagnosis of IA was stratified as proven, probable, or possible according to previously published definitions. No IA was documented in patients receiving voriconazole prophylaxis. At 90 days after LT, the institutional cost of prophylaxis was $5324 or 5.6% of the predicted cost associated with post-LT aspergillosis. There was no documentation of resistant strains isolated from any recipient who received voriconazole. In conclusion, these data suggest that voriconazole prophylaxis is safe, clinically effective, and cost-effective in high-risk LT recipients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisCost-Benefit AnalysisEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRenal Replacement TherapyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTransplant RecipientsTreatment OutcomeVoriconazoleYoung Adult