Diabetes & metabolism · 2006
Characteristics and six-month outcomes in a cohort of 8288 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with previous history of acute coronary syndrome or stroke: the French PREVENIR 3 survey.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bouhanick B, Cambou J P, Ferrières J, Amelineau E, Guize L
Аннотация
AIMS: To evaluate the cardiovascular prognosis of 1845 Diabetic Patients (DP) and 6443 Non-Diabetic Patients (NDP) in secondary prevention.
METHODS: Patients were recruited prospectively if they had had a previous history of ischemic stroke or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) i.e. Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Unstable Angina (UA) within a period of five years preceding inclusion. For each patient, the number of hospitalizations and vital status were recorded each month over a 6-month period (mean follow-up: 4.8 months).
RESULTS: 306 patients (9.5/100--person years; 95% CI, 8.5 to 10.6) had undergone at least one subsequent event (hospitalization for ACS, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). A majority of these events were non-fatal ACS (n=248). The cumulative incidence rate of subsequent events was higher in DP: 12.6/100- person years (10.0 to 15.2) than in NDP: 8.6/100--person years (7.5 to 9.8). DP were significantly at higher risk of subsequent cardiovascular events (OR: 1.34; P=0.025) after adjustment for confounding factors. 93% of coronary DP and NDP underwent a recurrent event affecting the same location. When the index episode was a stroke, 71% of DP had a subsequent stroke vs. 47% of NDP.
CONCLUSION: in secondary prevention, the risk of mortality and subsequent vascular events is independently higher in French DP than in NDP. The locations affected by each type of subsequent cardiovascular event seemed correlated to the baseline diagnosis, whatever the diabetic status, even when the frequency of subsequent strokes increased (not significantly) in DP when compared to NDP.
METHODS: Patients were recruited prospectively if they had had a previous history of ischemic stroke or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) i.e. Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Unstable Angina (UA) within a period of five years preceding inclusion. For each patient, the number of hospitalizations and vital status were recorded each month over a 6-month period (mean follow-up: 4.8 months).
RESULTS: 306 patients (9.5/100--person years; 95% CI, 8.5 to 10.6) had undergone at least one subsequent event (hospitalization for ACS, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). A majority of these events were non-fatal ACS (n=248). The cumulative incidence rate of subsequent events was higher in DP: 12.6/100- person years (10.0 to 15.2) than in NDP: 8.6/100--person years (7.5 to 9.8). DP were significantly at higher risk of subsequent cardiovascular events (OR: 1.34; P=0.025) after adjustment for confounding factors. 93% of coronary DP and NDP underwent a recurrent event affecting the same location. When the index episode was a stroke, 71% of DP had a subsequent stroke vs. 47% of NDP.
CONCLUSION: in secondary prevention, the risk of mortality and subsequent vascular events is independently higher in French DP than in NDP. The locations affected by each type of subsequent cardiovascular event seemed correlated to the baseline diagnosis, whatever the diabetic status, even when the frequency of subsequent strokes increased (not significantly) in DP when compared to NDP.