Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in unstable angina pectoris versus stable angina pectoris in two different time periods.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unstable angina pectoris (UAP) has traditionally been associated with a higher risk of ischemic complications than that for stable angina pectoris (SAP). However, PCI procedures have evolved, so this study was designed to determine whether PCI for UAP is still associated with less favorable outcomes. In-hospital and 1-year outcomes in Dynamic Registry patients who presented for PCI with UAP (n = 2,994) or SAP (n = 1,457) between 1997 and 2002 were compared. One-year results were also compared with consecutive patients who underwent angioplasty (n = 2,431) from the 1985 to 1986 Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Although Dynamic Registry patients with UAP were older and more likely to smoke (p < 0.05), have diabetes mellitus (p = 0.03), or a previous myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), procedural success was higher than in patients with SAP. By 1 year, there was greater risk of death (4.4% vs 2.6%, p < 0.01), death/myocardial infarction (9.9% vs 6.6%, p < 0.001), and death, myocardial infarction, and coronary artery bypass grafting (15.1% vs 11.6%, p < 0.01) in patients with UAP. In patients with UAP, there was no significant difference in adjusted 1-year death and death/myocardial infarction rates when comparing the waves of the Dynamic Registry with those of the Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry, although death/myocardial infarction rates among Dynamic Registry patients were lower. However, in patients with SAP, the adjusted rate for death/myocardial infarction was lower in wave 3, and for death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization, there was a significant decrease in event rates with each successive recruitment period (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). In conclusion, in contradistinction to patients with SAP, death and death/myocardial infarction rates in patients who have undergone PCI for UAP have not significantly decreased over the past 16 years and patients with UAP remain at a greater risk of ischemic events at 1 year compared with patients with SAP.