MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.70252

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2026

Oncological Safety of the Submental Artery Island Flap for Oral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Taseen Shafaq, Qureshi Muhammad Fazal Hussain, Abbas Munib, Ghaloo Shayan K, Wasif Muhammad, Iftikhar Haissan, Pasha Hamdan A, Dhanani Rahim

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Submental artery island flap is a pedicled regional flap which is used as one of the quicker reconstructive options for oral cavity defects. However, concerns about its oncological safety have been raised due to the proximity of the submental lymph nodes, which may harbor metastatic deposits. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the oncological safety of the SAIF oral cavity reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PICO model. Studies were included if they assessed the oncological safety of the SAIF in oral cavity reconstruction.

RESULTS

The use of SAIF for oral cavity reconstruction appears to provide reasonable oncological safety in terms of locoregional recurrence. The overall pooled recurrence rate across the studies was 16% (95% CI: 14%-18%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates that the submental artery island flap is an oncologically safe and reliable reconstructive option for oral cavity defects following OSCC resection in carefully selected patients.

Для цитирования: Taseen Shafaq, Qureshi Muhammad Fazal Hussain, Abbas Munib, Ghaloo Shayan K, Wasif Muhammad, Iftikhar Haissan, Pasha Hamdan A, Dhanani Rahim. Oncological Safety of the Submental Artery Island Flap for Oral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Head & neck. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/hed.70252.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.