Omitting Bone Marrow Sampling in FDG-Avid Rhabdomyosarcoma With 2-[18F]FDG PET-Negative Marrow: Results From an International Retrospective Study.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mercolini Federico, Just Marissa, Shulkin Barry L, Collins Natalie B, Crane Jacquelyn, Harrison Douglas, Affinita Maria C, Allen-Rhoades Wendy, Alessi Alessandra, Asaftei Sebastian D, Arnold Michael A, Chen Sonja, Chiaravalli Stefano, FitzGerald Forrest, Freitag Martin T, Iftner Jessica L, Khalatbari Hedieh, de Keizer Bart, von Luettichau Irene, Mauz-Körholz Christine, Rossig Claudia, Rovera Guido, Rutkowski Stefan, Sims Justin B, Voss Stephan D, Yoshimi Ayami, Birz Suzi, Bisogno Gianni, Ebinger Martin, Merks Johannes H M, Sparber-Sauer Monika, Haller Bernhard, Weiss Aaron R, Linardic Corinne M, Schoot Reineke A, Hettmer Simone, INSTRuCT Imaging/Pathology/Biology Network
Аннотация
METHODS: Patients were recruited in Europe and North America. Medical records, FDG PET/CT or FDG PET/MRI (PET), and BMAB reports were collected retrospectively. Images were re-reviewed by nuclear medicine physicians at the patients' home institutions if PET reports indicated increased FDG uptake at bone/bone marrow sites or if tumor cells were detected in bone marrow samples.
RESULTS: PET imaging and BMAB were performed before chemotherapy and tumor resection in 301 patients with FDG-avid RMS. Bone marrow metastases were detected by PET and BMAB in 54, by PET only in 24, and by BMAB only in one of 301 patients with FDG-avid primary tumors. Absence of bone marrow metastases was confirmed by PET and BMAB in 222 of 301 patients. These observations translated into 98% sensitivity and 90% specificity for PET in detecting bone marrow metastases when BMAB was considered as gold standard. FDG-avid marrow disease was patchy (1-5 foci) in one third of cases. Patients with marrow disease indicated by PET and BMAB had more FDG-avid bone marrow foci, more metastatic sites, and lower survival than those with marrow disease indicated by PET only, suggesting more advanced disease stages.
CONCLUSION: Bone marrow sampling may be omitted in patients without evidence of FDG-avid bone marrow disease by PET. If there are FDG-avid bone marrow lesions, further investigation by MRI and/or biopsy should be considered.