Annals of vascular surgery · 2021
Treatment of Early Deep Wound Infections after Arterial Reconstructions: A Meta-Analysis and Survey.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sharath Sherene E, Zamani Nader, DeSantis Stacia, Kougias Panos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peripheral vascular graft infections, a serious concern after open lower extremity interventions, are treated using multiple strategies. Yet, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment. This study summarizes the literature and compares aggregate effect sizes between graft preservation with antibiotic beads and total graft excision.
METHODS: Manuscripts published between 1972 and 2019 were systematically queried using Ovid Medline and PubMed. Studies were included if they described early (≤4 months of the index procedure) infection-related outcomes after extracavitary and infrainguinal arterial graft infections that were managed with antibiotic-loaded beads or total excisions. Outcomes assessed included the prevalence of graft preservation failure, reinfection, and major amputation. To examine current preferences on this subject, a voluntary, anonymous survey was administered to practicing members of the Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery.
RESULTS: Six graft preservation studies (n = 147 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, based on PRISMA guidelines. The meta-analytic pooled proportion of patients with: (1) graft preservation failure was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.46, I2 = 88.8%), (2) reinfection was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.18, I2 = 79.7%), and (3) major amputation was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.04, I2 = 0%). Five studies addressing total excisions were identified via the systematic review however, their combined sample size (n = 28 patients) impeded use of a meta-analysis. Ninety (19%) licensed surgeons participated in the survey. In a hemodynamically stable, nonseptic patient, 67% (60) of respondents routinely excise the graft, while 31% (28) prefer preservation.
CONCLUSIONS: Study design and patient characteristic-related heterogeneity limited our ability to generate robust, clinical evidence-level outcome estimates. A prospective study is necessary to definitively establish the efficacy of antibiotic beads in the treatment and preservation of vascular graft infections.
METHODS: Manuscripts published between 1972 and 2019 were systematically queried using Ovid Medline and PubMed. Studies were included if they described early (≤4 months of the index procedure) infection-related outcomes after extracavitary and infrainguinal arterial graft infections that were managed with antibiotic-loaded beads or total excisions. Outcomes assessed included the prevalence of graft preservation failure, reinfection, and major amputation. To examine current preferences on this subject, a voluntary, anonymous survey was administered to practicing members of the Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery.
RESULTS: Six graft preservation studies (n = 147 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, based on PRISMA guidelines. The meta-analytic pooled proportion of patients with: (1) graft preservation failure was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.46, I2 = 88.8%), (2) reinfection was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.18, I2 = 79.7%), and (3) major amputation was 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.04, I2 = 0%). Five studies addressing total excisions were identified via the systematic review however, their combined sample size (n = 28 patients) impeded use of a meta-analysis. Ninety (19%) licensed surgeons participated in the survey. In a hemodynamically stable, nonseptic patient, 67% (60) of respondents routinely excise the graft, while 31% (28) prefer preservation.
CONCLUSIONS: Study design and patient characteristic-related heterogeneity limited our ability to generate robust, clinical evidence-level outcome estimates. A prospective study is necessary to definitively establish the efficacy of antibiotic beads in the treatment and preservation of vascular graft infections.