Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2004
Propranolol alone may not be acceptable to prevent first esophageal variceal bleeding in Japanese cirrhotic patients: randomized controlled trial.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tomikawa Morimasa, Shimabukuro Rinshun, Okita Keishi, Tsutsumi Norifumi, Akahoshi Tomohiko, Hashizume Makoto, Sugimachi Keizo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In Japan, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) is widely used to prevent first esophageal variceal bleeding, in contrast to pharmacological therapy which is the main treatment used in the rest of the world. The present study investigated if propranolol alone is acceptable to prevent first esophageal variceal bleeding in Japanese cirrhotic patients. This was compared with EIS.
METHODS: Twenty-five Japanese cirrhotic patients with endoscopically proven, likely to bleed esophageal varices were randomly assigned for propranolol administration (12 patients; group A) and EIS (13 patients; group B) to prevent first esophageal variceal bleeding. Complications, non-recurrence rate, bleeding rate and probability of survival were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: One patient in group A had severe bradycardia with loss of consciousness that seriously worsened his quality of life. The cumulative non-recurrence rate of group A was significantly lower compared with that of group B (P < 0.05). In group A, 2 of the 12 patients requested to discontinue taking propranolol and were excluded from the trial. The EIS treatment (group B) showed excellent results. No patient in group A or group B bled from esophageal varices throughout this study. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in probability of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol alone may not be acceptable to prevent first esophageal variceal bleeding in Japanese cirrhotic patients.
METHODS: Twenty-five Japanese cirrhotic patients with endoscopically proven, likely to bleed esophageal varices were randomly assigned for propranolol administration (12 patients; group A) and EIS (13 patients; group B) to prevent first esophageal variceal bleeding. Complications, non-recurrence rate, bleeding rate and probability of survival were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: One patient in group A had severe bradycardia with loss of consciousness that seriously worsened his quality of life. The cumulative non-recurrence rate of group A was significantly lower compared with that of group B (P < 0.05). In group A, 2 of the 12 patients requested to discontinue taking propranolol and were excluded from the trial. The EIS treatment (group B) showed excellent results. No patient in group A or group B bled from esophageal varices throughout this study. The two groups showed no statistically significant differences in probability of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol alone may not be acceptable to prevent first esophageal variceal bleeding in Japanese cirrhotic patients.