Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
C-peptide Index under Non-fasting Conditions Can Predict the Likelihood of Future Insulin Therapy in Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Receiving Insulin at Baseline.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Iwamoto Yuichiro, Kimura Tomohiko, Morimoto Yuichi, Kimura Yuto, Komi Masahiro, Watanabe Yuki, Sasaki Taku, Kubo Masato, Nakao Erina, Okamoto Yui, Sugisaki Toshitomo, Dan Kazunori, Iwamoto Hideyuki, Sanada Junpei, Fushimi Yoshiro, Katakura Yukino, Shimoda Masashi, Nakanishi Shuhei, Mune Tomoatsu, Kaku Kohei, Kaneto Hideaki
Аннотация
Objective This study aimed to develop a clinical model in which the C-peptide index (CPI) under non-fasting conditions can predict future insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods This was a single-center retrospective study. We analyzed the correlation between non-fasting CPI and future insulin therapy in 464 patients who T2DM not receive insulin therapy who attended our clinic and were evaluated for non-fasting CPI on an outpatient basis. We used machine learning as an adjunct method to create a clinical model to predict future insulin therapy. Results At the end of the observation period, 22 participants remained on insulin therapy (continuous insulin therapy group: CIG), and 442 were not on insulin therapy (without insulin therapy group: WIG). HbA1c and serum creatinine (Cre) were significantly higher in the CIG than in the WIG (p<0.001 and p=0.045, respectively). The non-fasting CPI was lower in the CIG than in the WIG (p<0.001). The cutoff value of non-fasting CPI to predict the need of future insulin therapy was 1.62 (sensitivity 40.9%, specificity 90.7%), and the cutoff value to indicate the low possibility of future insulin therapy was 3.11 (sensitivity 90.1%, specificity 48.9%). A clinical model was created to predict future insulin therapy by machine learning using the Easy Ensemble Classifier method with non-fasting CPI, HbA1c, and Cre as features (accuracy, 78.5%; area under the ROC curve 0.86, false positive rate, 18.2%; false negative rate, 22.2%). Conclusion CPI under non-fasting conditions can predict the likelihood of future insulin therapy in outpatients with T2DM.