European journal of radiology · 2024
Quantifying the reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability of radiomics features in magnetic resonance Image-Guide accelerator Imaging: A phantom study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Hang, Tang Bin, Fu Yuchuan, Wei Weige, He Yisong, Dai Guyu, Xiao Qing
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the inter-platform reproducibility and longitudinal acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1-weighted (T1W) sequences on MR-Linac systems using an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used two MR-Linac systems (A and B) in different cancer centers. The ACR phantom was scanned on system A daily for 30 consecutive days to evaluate longitudinal repeatability. Additionally, retest data were collected after repositioning the phantom. Inter-platform reproducibility was assessed by conducting scans under identical conditions using system B. Regions of interest were delineated on the T1W sequence from system A and mapped to other sequences via rigid registration. Intra-observer and inter-observer comparisons were conducted. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Robust radiomics features were identified based on ICC>0.9 and CV<10 %.
RESULTS: Analysis showed that a higher proportion of radiomics features derived from longitudinal FLAIR sequence (51.65 %) met robustness criteria compared to T2W (48.35 %) and T1W (43.96 %). Additionally, more inter-platform features from the FLAIR sequence (62.64 %) were robust compared to T2W (42.86 %) and T1W (39.56 %). Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability were excellent across all sequences, with a median ICC of 0.99 and CV<5%. However, inter-observer reproducibility was inferior, especially for the T1W sequence.
CONCLUSIONS: Different sequences show variations in repeatability and reproducibility. The FLAIR sequence demonstrated advantages in both longitudinal repeatability and inter-platform reproducibility. Caution is warranted when interpreting data, particularly in longitudinal or multiplatform radiomics studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used two MR-Linac systems (A and B) in different cancer centers. The ACR phantom was scanned on system A daily for 30 consecutive days to evaluate longitudinal repeatability. Additionally, retest data were collected after repositioning the phantom. Inter-platform reproducibility was assessed by conducting scans under identical conditions using system B. Regions of interest were delineated on the T1W sequence from system A and mapped to other sequences via rigid registration. Intra-observer and inter-observer comparisons were conducted. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Robust radiomics features were identified based on ICC>0.9 and CV<10 %.
RESULTS: Analysis showed that a higher proportion of radiomics features derived from longitudinal FLAIR sequence (51.65 %) met robustness criteria compared to T2W (48.35 %) and T1W (43.96 %). Additionally, more inter-platform features from the FLAIR sequence (62.64 %) were robust compared to T2W (42.86 %) and T1W (39.56 %). Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability were excellent across all sequences, with a median ICC of 0.99 and CV<5%. However, inter-observer reproducibility was inferior, especially for the T1W sequence.
CONCLUSIONS: Different sequences show variations in repeatability and reproducibility. The FLAIR sequence demonstrated advantages in both longitudinal repeatability and inter-platform reproducibility. Caution is warranted when interpreting data, particularly in longitudinal or multiplatform radiomics studies.