Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025
Moderators of aerobic exercise effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Ryul, Kang Nyeonju, Lee Joon Ho, Lee Hanall, Lee Tae Lee, Ko Do Kyung, Lee Hajun, Byun Kyeongho, Park Kiwon, Lee Jee-Young, Jeon Beomseok
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Although growing evidence suggests that aerobic exercise has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), it remains unclear which specific aerobic exercise regimen optimizes improvement in these symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the effects of aerobic exercise on motor function in patients with PD according to exercise intervention protocols.
METHODS: Through 28 qualified studies with randomized controlled trials, we assessed motor function using either the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) III or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS III as an outcome measure. We employed random effects meta-analysis models to obtain standardized mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Moderator variable analyses were conducted based on exercise type (aerobic exercise vs. aerobic-based combined exercise), duration (<60 min vs. ≥60 min per session), frequency (<four vs. ≥four sessions per week), period (<12 weeks vs. ≥12 weeks), and intensity (low-to-moderate vs. moderate-to-high).
RESULTS: Aerobic exercise interventions demonstrated significant improvements in overall motor function. Although all categories were significantly effective in improving motor function, aerobic-based combined exercise had a greater effect size on motor symptoms compared to aerobic exercise alone. Additionally, ≥60 min per session showed a significantly increased effect size compared to <60 min per session. The impact of aerobic exercise did not differ based on exercise frequency, period, or intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest that aerobic-based combined exercise and exercise sessions lasting 60 min or longer may be associated with greater improvements in motor symptoms in patients with PD.
METHODS: Through 28 qualified studies with randomized controlled trials, we assessed motor function using either the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) III or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS III as an outcome measure. We employed random effects meta-analysis models to obtain standardized mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Moderator variable analyses were conducted based on exercise type (aerobic exercise vs. aerobic-based combined exercise), duration (<60 min vs. ≥60 min per session), frequency (<four vs. ≥four sessions per week), period (<12 weeks vs. ≥12 weeks), and intensity (low-to-moderate vs. moderate-to-high).
RESULTS: Aerobic exercise interventions demonstrated significant improvements in overall motor function. Although all categories were significantly effective in improving motor function, aerobic-based combined exercise had a greater effect size on motor symptoms compared to aerobic exercise alone. Additionally, ≥60 min per session showed a significantly increased effect size compared to <60 min per session. The impact of aerobic exercise did not differ based on exercise frequency, period, or intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest that aerobic-based combined exercise and exercise sessions lasting 60 min or longer may be associated with greater improvements in motor symptoms in patients with PD.