MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02052593

Медицинская библиотека · Diseases of the colon and rectum · 1994

Is simple fistula-in-ano simple?

Sangwan Y P, Rosen L, Riether R D, Stasik J J, Sheets J A, Khubchandani I T

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: A study of 523 fistulas of cryptoglandular origin operated on between January 1985 and December 1991 at the Lehigh Valley Hospital was undertaken for the purpose of establishing whether the "so-called" simple fistula-in-ano has a favorable outcome. High transsphincteric fistulas with or without high blind tract, suprasphincteric, extrasphincteric, and horseshoe fistulas as well as fistulas associated with inflammatory bowel disease were excluded.

METHODS

Four-hundred sixty-one patients with anal fistulas classified as simple fistulas-in-ano (uncomplicated transsphincteric, low and high blind track intersphincteric) were studied retrospectively. There were 310 males and 151 females with an average age of 42 years and mean follow-up of 34 months.

RESULTS

Thirty (6.5 percent) patients developed recurrent fistulas: 16 (53.3 percent) because of missed internal openings at initial surgery, six (20 percent) attributed to missed secondary tracks, five (16.7 percent) because of premature fistulotomy wound closure, and three (10 percent) because of miscellaneous factors.

CONCLUSION

All so-called simple fistulas-in-ano may not have readily detectable primary openings and may possess secondary tracks which preclude their behavior as simple fistulas.

Для цитирования: Sangwan Y P, Rosen L, Riether R D, Stasik J J, Sheets J A, Khubchandani I T. Is simple fistula-in-ano simple?. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 1994. DOI: 10.1007/bf02052593.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.