m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology · 2012

Mitochondrial molecular basis of sevoflurane and propofol cardioprotection in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass.

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Jovic Miomir, Stancic Ana, Nenadic Dragan, Cekic Olivera, Nezic Dusko, Milojevic Predrag, Micovic Slobodan, Buzadzic Biljana, Korac Aleksandra, Otasevic Vesna, Jankovic Aleksandra, Vucetic Milica, Velickovic Ksenija, Golic Igor, Korac Bato

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Study elucidates and compares the mitochondrial bioenergetic-related molecular basis of sevoflurane and propofol cardioprotection during aortic valve replacement surgery due to aortic valve stenosis.

METHODS: Twenty-two patients were prospectively randomized in two groups regarding the anesthetic regime: sevoflurane and propofol. Hemodynamic parameters, biomarkers of cardiac injury and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In tissue samples, taken from the interventricular septum, key mitochondrial molecules were determined by Western blot, real time PCR, as well as confocal microscopy and immunohisto- and immunocyto-chemical analysis.

RESULTS: The protein levels of cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase were higher in sevoflurane than in propofol group. Nevertheless, cytochrome c protein content was higher in propofol than sevoflurane receiving patients. Propofol group also showed higher protein level of connexin 43 (Cx43) than sevoflurane group. Besides, immunogold analysis showed its mitochondrial localization. The mRNA level of mtDNA and uncoupling protein (UCP2) were higher in propofol than sevoflurane patients, as well. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between groups in hemodynamic assessment, intensive care unit length of stay, troponin I and BNP level.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that sevoflurane and propofol lead to cardiac protection via different mitochondrially related molecular mechanisms. It appears that sevoflurane acts regulating cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase, while the effects of propofol occur through regulation of cytochrome c, Cx43, mtDNA transcription and UCP2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты