HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2025
A multi-centre, UK-based, cohort study assessing the role of robotic common bile duct exploration for complex choledocholithiasis.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stefanova Irena, Callahan Rosie, Giriradder Vandana B, Chouari Tarak, Latif Javed, Renardson Lydia, Hassan Eslam, Aroori Somaiah, Awan Altaf, Bhatti Imran, Platt Esther, Kumar Rajesh, Riga Angela, Worthington Timothy R, Frampton Adam E, Lahiri Rajiv P, Pencavel Tim D, Ahmad Jawad
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the gold-standard treatment for choledocholithiasis. This retrospective multicentric cohort study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and role of robotic common bile duct exploration (RCBDE) in treating choledocholithiasis.
METHODS: All adult (≥18 years) consecutive patients undergoing RCBDE either alongside or following cholecystectomy between 2018 and 2024 were included. Primary outcome was success in stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included open conversion, length of hospital stay, post-operative complications and interventions, 30-day re-admission, and 90-day mortality rates.
RESULTS: A total of 102 consecutive RCBDEs were performed. Biliary access was transcholedochal in 86.3 % (88/102) and transcystic in 13.7 % (14/102). Stone clearance was achieved in 92.2 % (94/102) of cases, with a bile leak rate of 2.9 % (3/102), and an overall morbidity rate of 19.6 % (20/102), including 7.8 % (8/102) with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications. Overall conversion rate was 9.8 %, with significantly lower rates in single-stage procedures, where RCBDE was performed alongside cholecystectomy, compared to RCBDE alone, 1.4 % (1/73) vs 30.4 % (7/23), (P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the high success rate in stone clearance and low bile leak rate associated with RCBDE. However, open conversion rate was significantly increased when RCBDE was performed following previous cholecystectomy.
METHODS: All adult (≥18 years) consecutive patients undergoing RCBDE either alongside or following cholecystectomy between 2018 and 2024 were included. Primary outcome was success in stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included open conversion, length of hospital stay, post-operative complications and interventions, 30-day re-admission, and 90-day mortality rates.
RESULTS: A total of 102 consecutive RCBDEs were performed. Biliary access was transcholedochal in 86.3 % (88/102) and transcystic in 13.7 % (14/102). Stone clearance was achieved in 92.2 % (94/102) of cases, with a bile leak rate of 2.9 % (3/102), and an overall morbidity rate of 19.6 % (20/102), including 7.8 % (8/102) with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications. Overall conversion rate was 9.8 %, with significantly lower rates in single-stage procedures, where RCBDE was performed alongside cholecystectomy, compared to RCBDE alone, 1.4 % (1/73) vs 30.4 % (7/23), (P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the high success rate in stone clearance and low bile leak rate associated with RCBDE. However, open conversion rate was significantly increased when RCBDE was performed following previous cholecystectomy.