Determination of Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills: Results of a Multidisciplinary, Modified Delphi Process.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tisherman Samuel A, Spevetz Antoinette, Farmer J Christopher, Kashyap Rahul, Michener Ed, Leichtle Stefan W, Sreedharan Roshni, Strickler Samantha S, Chang Cherylee W J, Yataco Angel Coz, Cuschieri Joseph, Dudzinski David, Ellender Timothy, Emlet Lillian L, Fahy Brenda G, Geller Bram J, Hennessey Erin, Kaups Krista L, Keegan Mark T, Lee May M, Malaiyandi Deepa, Michetti Christopher P, Mohr Nicholas M, Moitra Vivek K, O'Neil Kevin, Palmieri Tina L, Park Pauline K, Pathak Abhijit, Raksin P B, Shapshak Angela Hays, Siddiqui Shahla, Stein Deborah M, Timmons Shelly D, Vespa Paul M, Wessman Brian T, Wittwer Erica D, Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine
Аннотация
DESIGN: A master list of content areas and procedural skills was compiled from all CCM subspecialty program requirements and blueprints of the certification examinations. Using a modified Delphi approach, participants were asked to categorize the knowledge items as "advanced knowledge is essential," "general, but not advanced, knowledge is essential," or "knowledge is not essential." Procedures were categorized as "intensivist performs routinely," "intensivist only performs in an emergency," or "intensivist knows" about the procedure.
SETTING: Representatives from CCM stakeholder organizations, including accreditation and certification organizations, critical care societies, and program directors' societies, were invited to participate.
SUBJECTS: Members of the Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
INTERVENTIONS: For the first two rounds of the modified Delphi process, Research Electronic Data Capture was used. For the third and fourth rounds, the process was completed through online meetings with Zoom (Zoom Video Corporations, San Jose, CA) utilizing Zoom's polling feature.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 541 items were determined to be essential, with 145 requiring advanced knowledge and 323 requiring general knowledge. For 73 items, consensus regarding advanced vs. general could not be achieved, but they remained essential. Only eight items were felt to be nonessential. Of the 16 procedures, most were categorized as "intensivist performs."
CONCLUSIONS: The large number of items included in the list of essential knowledge and skills demonstrates the complexity of modern CCM. Utilization of a common framework across the subspecialties of CCM could lead to greater harmonization among the fellowship program requirements and certification examinations.