Oncology · 2025
Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Therapies in Biliary Tract Cancers: A Meta-Analysis on Disease Location, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Status, and Survival Outcomes.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Camera Silvia, Rimini Margherita, Foti Silvia, Lo Prinzi Federica, Vitiello Francesco, Amadeo Elisabeth, Persano Mara, Cascinu Stefano, Casadei-Gardini Andrea, Rossari Federico
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the therapeutic scenario of metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTCs) beyond first-line has profoundly changed owing to target therapies. human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) represents a promising molecular target that is frequently altered in BTC. The present meta-analyses aimed to describe the response rates and survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced/metastatic BTC treated with anti-HER2 therapies. Moreover, the study is intended to provide an update on the evolving therapeutic scenario of HER2-overexpressed BTC.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify clinical trials investigating any regimen comprising a HER2-targeted therapy for metastatic BTC, and we conducted three subsequent meta-analyses on second-line phase II trials. The first one was performed to compare the group of HER2 3+ versus the group of HER2 2+ BTC patients for objective response rate (ORR). The second one compared patients according to the tumor location (gallbladder carcinoma [GBC] or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [eCCA] versus intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [iCCA]) for ORR. The third one evaluated the overall outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Patients with advanced BTC and HER2 3+ had better ORR compared to HER2 2+, with a 3.7-fold higher probability of experiencing objective responses (HR 3.70, 95% CI, 1.34-10.25, p = 0.0119). Likewise, patients with GBC or eCCA had a 2.74-fold higher probability of experiencing an objective response compared to patients with iCCA (HR 2.74, 95% CI, 1.12-6.73, p = 0.0275). The weighted pooled analysis of trials with anti-HER2 agents in second line or beyond revealed an mPFS of 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.2-5.6), while mOS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.0-12.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analyses have revealed improved efficacy in patients with HER2 3+ metastatic BTC and in patients with GBC or eCCA treated with anti-HER2 therapies, with a considerable mPFS and mOS in the overall population of the phase II trials analyzed. Further studies are paramount to confirm our preliminary results.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify clinical trials investigating any regimen comprising a HER2-targeted therapy for metastatic BTC, and we conducted three subsequent meta-analyses on second-line phase II trials. The first one was performed to compare the group of HER2 3+ versus the group of HER2 2+ BTC patients for objective response rate (ORR). The second one compared patients according to the tumor location (gallbladder carcinoma [GBC] or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [eCCA] versus intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [iCCA]) for ORR. The third one evaluated the overall outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Patients with advanced BTC and HER2 3+ had better ORR compared to HER2 2+, with a 3.7-fold higher probability of experiencing objective responses (HR 3.70, 95% CI, 1.34-10.25, p = 0.0119). Likewise, patients with GBC or eCCA had a 2.74-fold higher probability of experiencing an objective response compared to patients with iCCA (HR 2.74, 95% CI, 1.12-6.73, p = 0.0275). The weighted pooled analysis of trials with anti-HER2 agents in second line or beyond revealed an mPFS of 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.2-5.6), while mOS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.0-12.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analyses have revealed improved efficacy in patients with HER2 3+ metastatic BTC and in patients with GBC or eCCA treated with anti-HER2 therapies, with a considerable mPFS and mOS in the overall population of the phase II trials analyzed. Further studies are paramount to confirm our preliminary results.