Neurology · 2004
Effect of levodopa treatment for parkinsonism in welders: A double-blind study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koller William C, Lyons Kelly E, Truly William
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Manganese is known to cause a parkinsonian syndrome similar clinically to Parkinson disease (PD). L-Dopa responsiveness is a hallmark of PD; however, L-dopa's effect on manganese-induced parkinsonism is not well defined.
OBJECTIVE: To access the efficacy and safety of L-dopa therapy in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS: Thirteen patients with manganese-induced parkinsonism were evaluated in a cross-over study with a modified Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS), timed walk test, tapping, and global clinical impression scores. Adverse reactions were assessed.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between placebo and L-dopa for any measure: motor UPDRS, 27.4 vs 28.8; walk time, 16.6 seconds vs 17.7 seconds; tapping right hand, 69.5 vs 64.7; and tapping left hand, 66.8 vs 64.4. There were no differences in the global impression scores. Adverse reactions occurred similarly in the two groups, including headaches, drowsiness, and diarrhea.
CONCLUSIONS: L-Dopa therapy is not effective for the management of parkinsonism in welders. L-dopa unresponsiveness may be useful to distinguish manganese-induced parkinsonism from Parkinson disease.
OBJECTIVE: To access the efficacy and safety of L-dopa therapy in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS: Thirteen patients with manganese-induced parkinsonism were evaluated in a cross-over study with a modified Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS), timed walk test, tapping, and global clinical impression scores. Adverse reactions were assessed.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between placebo and L-dopa for any measure: motor UPDRS, 27.4 vs 28.8; walk time, 16.6 seconds vs 17.7 seconds; tapping right hand, 69.5 vs 64.7; and tapping left hand, 66.8 vs 64.4. There were no differences in the global impression scores. Adverse reactions occurred similarly in the two groups, including headaches, drowsiness, and diarrhea.
CONCLUSIONS: L-Dopa therapy is not effective for the management of parkinsonism in welders. L-dopa unresponsiveness may be useful to distinguish manganese-induced parkinsonism from Parkinson disease.