The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2021
Limited Left Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy Effectively Silences Refractory Electrical Storm.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krause Eric M, Appelbaum Jason, Naselsky Warren, Dickfeld Timm, Friedberg Joseph, See Vincent, Burrows Whitney
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition that affects up to 20% of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. In this small retrospective study, we report our results with left video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy/ganglionectomy (VATSG) to treat refractory ES in low-ejection fraction patients who were not candidates for catheter ablation.
METHODS: We identified 12 patients who presented with ES and underwent a total of 14 video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy/ganglionectomy, including 3 patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We reviewed demographic data, survival to discharge, number of cardioversions (before and after VATSG), need for readmissions, and need for right-sided procedures.
RESULTS: In the 30 days before a left VATSG, mean number of shocks was 22.67 for all patients. For the patients who survived to discharge, the mean was 3.55 since surgery and the median was zero shocks after a median follow-up of 358 days. Six patients did not experience further cardioversions since the last VATSG and 5 were not readmitted for ventricular tachycardia. Two patients had staged bilateral procedures owing to recurrences; of those, 1 did not require further cardioversions.
CONCLUSIONS: Limited left VATSG is an appropriate and effective initial treatment for ES patients who are not candidates for catheter ablation, including those on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for hemodynamic support.
METHODS: We identified 12 patients who presented with ES and underwent a total of 14 video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy/ganglionectomy, including 3 patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We reviewed demographic data, survival to discharge, number of cardioversions (before and after VATSG), need for readmissions, and need for right-sided procedures.
RESULTS: In the 30 days before a left VATSG, mean number of shocks was 22.67 for all patients. For the patients who survived to discharge, the mean was 3.55 since surgery and the median was zero shocks after a median follow-up of 358 days. Six patients did not experience further cardioversions since the last VATSG and 5 were not readmitted for ventricular tachycardia. Two patients had staged bilateral procedures owing to recurrences; of those, 1 did not require further cardioversions.
CONCLUSIONS: Limited left VATSG is an appropriate and effective initial treatment for ES patients who are not candidates for catheter ablation, including those on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for hemodynamic support.