Comparisons of Manual Tape Measurement and Morphomics Measurement of Patients with Upper Extremity Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a debilitating condition characterized by swelling from lymph fluid exceeding transport capacity. A gold standard for arm measurement is not established, and measurement methods vary. This study evaluates the comparability of the tape measure and Analytic Morphomics in deriving limb circumference measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.

METHODS

Fifteen participants with diagnosed upper limb lymphedema were included between July 2013 and June 2017 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan. Affected and unaffected arm circumferences were measured using a flexible tape or morphomic measurement at 10 cm above and below the elbow. Computed tomography scans were standardized, processed, smoothed with a piecewise polynomial algorithm for Analytic Morphomics of arm circumference. Comparative plots, mean percent difference, and adjusted coefficient of determination (R 2) were utilized to compare the consistency of both measurement procedures.

RESULTS

The tape measure and Analytic Morphomics demonstrated consistent measures of arm circumference. On the affected arm, the mean (95% CI) difference in arm circumference between methods was 1.60 cm (0.99-2.20) above, and 0.57 cm (0.23-0.91) below the elbow. Mean percent differences in circumference was 6.65% (SD 3.52%) above and 1.38% (SD 2.11%) below the elbow. The adjusted R 2 for both methods was 94% above and 96% below the elbow.

CONCLUSIONS

Analytic Morphomics showed strong consistency with the manual tape measure of arm circumference measurement in those with upper extremity lymphedema. Analytic Morphomics present an opportunity for a precise, granular measurement of limb composition for assessment of disease state and patient planning.