Head & neck · 2026
Disease Site-Specific Outcomes in p16-Positive Non-Oropharyngeal Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chelvarajah Revadhi C, Chee Lessandra Y S, Su Jie, O'Sullivan Brian, Yao Christopher M K L, Sanz-Garcia Enrique, Smith Stephen M, Weinreb Ilan, Bratman Scott, Cho B C John, Hahn Ezra, Hope Andrew, Hosni Ali, Kim John, McPartlin Andrew, Malik Nauman, Tsai Chiaojung Jillian, de Almeida John, Spreafico Anna, Tong Li, Huang Shao Hui, Waldron John N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To report disease-free survival (DFS) in p16-positive non-oropharyngeal head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
METHODS: Curatively-treated non-oropharyngeal HNSCC (2009-2021) were reviewed. DFS was compared among p16-positive, p16-negative, and p16-untested cases for the overall cohort and by disease site. Multivariable analysis estimated adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for p16-positivity.
RESULTS: Among 3061 non-oropharyngeal HNSCC, 91 p16+, 375 p16-, 2595 untested; median follow-up 4.7 years. P16-positive patients had superior 5-year DFS versus p16-/untested (74% vs. 48%/59%; aHR 0.40 [0.26-0.61], p < 0.001). This advantage was evident in the larynx (86% vs. 52%/63%; aHR 0.26 [0.09-0.71], p = 0.005), hypopharynx (70% vs. 25%/37%; aHR 0.55 [0.10-0.50], p < 0.001), and nasal cavity (82% vs. 38%/66%; aHR 0.31 [0.11-0.88], p = 0.028). No significant DFS differences were seen in paranasal sinus (40% vs. 64%/41%; p = 0.39) or oral cavity (50% vs. 57%/58%; p = 0.94).
CONCLUSION: p16-positivity confers a DFS benefit in larynx/hypopharynx/nasal cavity, but not in paranasal sinus or oral SCC.
METHODS: Curatively-treated non-oropharyngeal HNSCC (2009-2021) were reviewed. DFS was compared among p16-positive, p16-negative, and p16-untested cases for the overall cohort and by disease site. Multivariable analysis estimated adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for p16-positivity.
RESULTS: Among 3061 non-oropharyngeal HNSCC, 91 p16+, 375 p16-, 2595 untested; median follow-up 4.7 years. P16-positive patients had superior 5-year DFS versus p16-/untested (74% vs. 48%/59%; aHR 0.40 [0.26-0.61], p < 0.001). This advantage was evident in the larynx (86% vs. 52%/63%; aHR 0.26 [0.09-0.71], p = 0.005), hypopharynx (70% vs. 25%/37%; aHR 0.55 [0.10-0.50], p < 0.001), and nasal cavity (82% vs. 38%/66%; aHR 0.31 [0.11-0.88], p = 0.028). No significant DFS differences were seen in paranasal sinus (40% vs. 64%/41%; p = 0.39) or oral cavity (50% vs. 57%/58%; p = 0.94).
CONCLUSION: p16-positivity confers a DFS benefit in larynx/hypopharynx/nasal cavity, but not in paranasal sinus or oral SCC.