The British journal of surgery · 2003
Limits and drawbacks of video-assisted parathyroidectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berti P, Materazzi G, Picone A, Miccoli P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) is a novel minimally invasive approach to primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). It is a gasless operation characterized by a single central incision and external retraction. This paper describes the drawbacks and limitations of this procedure based on a 5-year experience and 260 operations.
METHODS: Of 364 patients with PHTP, 260 were selected for MIVAP. In most patients a unilateral minimally invasive exploration was performed.
RESULTS: MIVAP was carried out successfully in 239 patients with a mean operating time of 40 (range 20-180) min. Conversion to cervicotomy was required in 21 patients (8.1 per cent). Complications included recurrent nerve palsy in two patients (0.8 per cent), haemorrhage that required reoperation 6 h after parathyroidectomy in one patient (0.4 per cent) and transient hypoparathyroidism in six patients (2.5 per cent). In five patients (2.1 per cent) persistent PHPT developed shortly after surgery.
CONCLUSION: After 5 years of experience, MIVAP appears to be feasible, safe and applicable to the majority of patients with PHPT.
METHODS: Of 364 patients with PHTP, 260 were selected for MIVAP. In most patients a unilateral minimally invasive exploration was performed.
RESULTS: MIVAP was carried out successfully in 239 patients with a mean operating time of 40 (range 20-180) min. Conversion to cervicotomy was required in 21 patients (8.1 per cent). Complications included recurrent nerve palsy in two patients (0.8 per cent), haemorrhage that required reoperation 6 h after parathyroidectomy in one patient (0.4 per cent) and transient hypoparathyroidism in six patients (2.5 per cent). In five patients (2.1 per cent) persistent PHPT developed shortly after surgery.
CONCLUSION: After 5 years of experience, MIVAP appears to be feasible, safe and applicable to the majority of patients with PHPT.