Fertility and sterility · 2010
State laws and regulations addressing third-party reimbursement for infertility treatment: implications for cancer survivors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Quinn Gwendolyn P, Vadaparampil Susan T, McGowan Lowrey Kerri, Eidson Shelby, Knapp Caprice, Bukulmez Orhan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine codified state policies related to infertility and assess their implications for cancer patients. Lack of insurance is often identified as a barrier to use of fertility preservation (FP) services.
DESIGN: None.
SETTING: A keyword search was developed to identify statutes and administrative regulations of insurance coverage for FP in the United States.
PATIENT(S): N/A.
INTERVENTION(S): N/A.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Laws addressing the general population but pertaining to FP were compiled using Lexis-Nexis. Data were analyzed by reviewing the "plain meaning" of the text, legislative/administrative history, and annotated case law. Legal reasoning and common rules of statutory construction and legislative interpretation were used.
RESULT(S): Fifteen states (29.4%) had laws relating to insurance coverage for infertility or in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures and two states (CA and IL) specifically excluded IVF from a mandatory offer of coverage. No state laws or regulations addressed insurance coverage for FP methods specific to cancer patients.
CONCLUSION(S): There is an argument for policies that require coverage for FP for cancer survivors before treatment.
DESIGN: None.
SETTING: A keyword search was developed to identify statutes and administrative regulations of insurance coverage for FP in the United States.
PATIENT(S): N/A.
INTERVENTION(S): N/A.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Laws addressing the general population but pertaining to FP were compiled using Lexis-Nexis. Data were analyzed by reviewing the "plain meaning" of the text, legislative/administrative history, and annotated case law. Legal reasoning and common rules of statutory construction and legislative interpretation were used.
RESULT(S): Fifteen states (29.4%) had laws relating to insurance coverage for infertility or in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures and two states (CA and IL) specifically excluded IVF from a mandatory offer of coverage. No state laws or regulations addressed insurance coverage for FP methods specific to cancer patients.
CONCLUSION(S): There is an argument for policies that require coverage for FP for cancer survivors before treatment.