Pediatric pulmonology · 2021
Thoracoabdominal asynchrony and paradoxical motion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and healthy subjects during cough: A case control study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marques Layana, Fregonezi Guilherme Augusto de Freitas, Marcelino Ana Aline, Dourado-Júnior Mario Emílio Teixeira, Sarmento Antonio, Pennati Francesca, Aliverti Andrea, Resqueti Vanessa Regiane
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA) and inspiratory paradoxical motion at different positionings in subjects with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) versus healthy subjects during quiet spontaneous breathing (QB) and cough.
METHODS: This is a case control study with a matched-pair design. We assessed 14 DMD subjects and 12 controls using optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) during QB and spontaneous cough in 3 positions: supine, supine with headrest raised at 45°, and sitting with back support at 80°. The TAA was assessed using phase angle (θ) between upper (RCp) and lower rib cage (RCa) and abdomen (AB), as well as the percentage of inspiratory time the RCp (IPRCp ), RCa (IPRCa ), and AB (IPAB ) moved in opposite directions.
RESULTS: During cough, DMD group showed higher RCp and RCa θ (p < .05), RCp and AB θ (p < .05) in supine and 45° positions, and higher RCp and Rca θ (p = .006) only in supine position compared with controls. Regarding the intragroup analysis, during cough, DMD group presented higher RCp and AB θ (p = .02) and RCa and AB θ (p = .002) in supine and higher RCa and AB θ (p = .002) in 45° position when compared to 80°. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyzes were able to discriminate TAA between controls and DMD in RCa supine position (area under the curve: 0.81, sensibility: 78.6% and specificity: 91.7%, p = .001).
CONCLUSION: Subjects with DMD yields TAA with insufficient deflation of chest wall compartments and rib cage distortion during cough, by noninvasive assessment.
METHODS: This is a case control study with a matched-pair design. We assessed 14 DMD subjects and 12 controls using optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) during QB and spontaneous cough in 3 positions: supine, supine with headrest raised at 45°, and sitting with back support at 80°. The TAA was assessed using phase angle (θ) between upper (RCp) and lower rib cage (RCa) and abdomen (AB), as well as the percentage of inspiratory time the RCp (IPRCp ), RCa (IPRCa ), and AB (IPAB ) moved in opposite directions.
RESULTS: During cough, DMD group showed higher RCp and RCa θ (p < .05), RCp and AB θ (p < .05) in supine and 45° positions, and higher RCp and Rca θ (p = .006) only in supine position compared with controls. Regarding the intragroup analysis, during cough, DMD group presented higher RCp and AB θ (p = .02) and RCa and AB θ (p = .002) in supine and higher RCa and AB θ (p = .002) in 45° position when compared to 80°. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyzes were able to discriminate TAA between controls and DMD in RCa supine position (area under the curve: 0.81, sensibility: 78.6% and specificity: 91.7%, p = .001).
CONCLUSION: Subjects with DMD yields TAA with insufficient deflation of chest wall compartments and rib cage distortion during cough, by noninvasive assessment.