The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016
Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ohtani Hirofumi, Kimura Shigeki, Sugiyama Tomoyo, Hishikari Keiichi, Misawa Toru, Mizusawa Masafumi, Hayasaka Kazuto, Yamakami Yosuke, Kojima Keisuke, Sagawa Yuichiro, Hikita Hiroyuki, Ashikaga Takashi, Takahashi Atsushi, Isobe Mitsuaki
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Few studies have directly compared vascular responses to second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). We performed optical coherence tomography examinations in 56 consecutive patients with implanted single stent [19 cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 22 platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), and 15 resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES)] for de novo lesions, and who did not have restenosis at their 9-month follow-up. Neointimal thickness (NIT), stent apposition, and neointimal coverage were assessed in every strut. A neointimal unevenness score [(NUS), maximum NIT/average NIT in the same cross-section] was determined for every 1-mm cross-section (CS). A total of 8350 struts and 1159 CSs were analyzed. The CoCr- and PtCr-EES had significantly fewer malapposed struts compared to the R-ZES (CoCr-EES: 0.19 % vs. PtCr-EES: 0.19 % vs.
R-ZES: 0.61 %, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the PtCr-EES had a lower frequency of uncovered struts compared to the others (CoCr-EES: 2.0 % vs. PtCr-EES: 1.4 % vs.
R-ZES: 2.3 %, p = 0.047). The NUS correlated with the frequency of uncovered struts (p < 0.001, r = 0.54). The EESs demonstrated more homogenous neointimal growth, as shown in the NUS, compared to the R-ZES [CoCr-EES: 1.66 (1.38-1.97) vs. PtCr-EES: 1.67 (1.41-2.00) vs.
R-ZES: 1.94 (1.56-2.28), p < 0.001]. Our results demonstrate that unevenness neointimal growth may relate with strut coverage after second-generation DES implantation. The PtCr-EES had a high frequency of strut coverage with a homogeneous neointima, suggesting fewer risks for stent thrombosis.
R-ZES: 0.61 %, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the PtCr-EES had a lower frequency of uncovered struts compared to the others (CoCr-EES: 2.0 % vs. PtCr-EES: 1.4 % vs.
R-ZES: 2.3 %, p = 0.047). The NUS correlated with the frequency of uncovered struts (p < 0.001, r = 0.54). The EESs demonstrated more homogenous neointimal growth, as shown in the NUS, compared to the R-ZES [CoCr-EES: 1.66 (1.38-1.97) vs. PtCr-EES: 1.67 (1.41-2.00) vs.
R-ZES: 1.94 (1.56-2.28), p < 0.001]. Our results demonstrate that unevenness neointimal growth may relate with strut coverage after second-generation DES implantation. The PtCr-EES had a high frequency of strut coverage with a homogeneous neointima, suggesting fewer risks for stent thrombosis.