MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm11154337

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2022

Gastric Cancer Screening in Japan: A Narrative Review.

Yashima Kazuo, Shabana Michiko, Kurumi Hiroki, Kawaguchi Koichiro, Isomoto Hajime

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer incidence in Japan, although gastric cancer mortality has decreased over the past few decades. This decrease is attributed to a decline in the prevalence of H. pylori infection. Radiographic examination has long been performed as the only method of gastric screening with evidence of reduction in mortality in the past. The revised 2014 Japanese Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening approved gastric endoscopy for use in population-based screening, together with radiography. While endoscopic gastric cancer screening has begun, there are some problems associated with its implementation, including endoscopic capacity, equal access, and cost-effectiveness. As H. pylori infection and atrophic gastritis are well-known risk factors for gastric cancer, a different screening method might be considered, depending on its association with the individual's background and gastric cancer risk. In this review, we summarize the current status and problems of gastric cancer screening in Japan. We also introduce and discuss the results of gastric cancer screening using H. pylori infection status in Hoki-cho, Tottori prefecture. Further, we review risk stratification as a system for improving gastric cancer screening in the future.

Для цитирования: Yashima Kazuo, Shabana Michiko, Kurumi Hiroki, Kawaguchi Koichiro, Isomoto Hajime. Gastric Cancer Screening in Japan: A Narrative Review.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154337.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.