Surgical neurology international · 2024
Timing of chronic subdural hematoma treatment affects middle meningeal artery embolization outcome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Imai Naoya, Kato Takayuki, Ito Yohei, Morishima Ryo, Aki Tatsuki, Shirakami Shin-Ichi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a condition that tends to recur frequently. Although middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an effective CSDH treatment, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal timing for embolization.
METHODS: In this single-center and retrospective study, we reviewed 72 cases with 1st-time recurrent CSDH from January 2018 to July 2023 and identified those treated with MMAE to examine its effect and the impact of differences in the timing of treatment.
RESULTS: Of the 72 cases with CSDH recurrence for the 1st time (mean age: 80.4 ± 9.7 years; men: 62 [86.1%]; mean first recurrence interval: 33 ± 24 days), 27 (37.5%) experienced a second recurrence. The mean first recurrence interval was shorter in cases with a second recurrence compared to cured cases: 24.3 ± 18.6 versus 38.3 ± 25.6 days, respectively (P = 0.005). MMAE was performed in 17 (23.6%) cases (mean age: 82 ± 6.2 years; men: 14 [82.4%]). The mean time from initial surgical treatment to embolization was 52.4 ± 35.4 days, and the mean recurrence interval before MMAE was 24.9 ± 19.6 days. Six cases (35.3%) experienced post-embolization recurrence and required surgical treatment. The mean recurrence interval before MMAE was shorter in cases with recurrence after MMAE (15 ± 6.4 vs. 30 ± 22.1 days, P = 0.023). The time from initial surgical treatment to embolization was significantly shorter: 31.3 ± 12.8 versus 63.9 ± 38.9 days (P = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: Cases with a short first recurrence interval were more likely to experience a second recurrence. Repeated recurrences within a short time increased the likelihood of post-embolization recurrence. MMAE performed early following the initial surgical treatment increased the recurrence risk.
METHODS: In this single-center and retrospective study, we reviewed 72 cases with 1st-time recurrent CSDH from January 2018 to July 2023 and identified those treated with MMAE to examine its effect and the impact of differences in the timing of treatment.
RESULTS: Of the 72 cases with CSDH recurrence for the 1st time (mean age: 80.4 ± 9.7 years; men: 62 [86.1%]; mean first recurrence interval: 33 ± 24 days), 27 (37.5%) experienced a second recurrence. The mean first recurrence interval was shorter in cases with a second recurrence compared to cured cases: 24.3 ± 18.6 versus 38.3 ± 25.6 days, respectively (P = 0.005). MMAE was performed in 17 (23.6%) cases (mean age: 82 ± 6.2 years; men: 14 [82.4%]). The mean time from initial surgical treatment to embolization was 52.4 ± 35.4 days, and the mean recurrence interval before MMAE was 24.9 ± 19.6 days. Six cases (35.3%) experienced post-embolization recurrence and required surgical treatment. The mean recurrence interval before MMAE was shorter in cases with recurrence after MMAE (15 ± 6.4 vs. 30 ± 22.1 days, P = 0.023). The time from initial surgical treatment to embolization was significantly shorter: 31.3 ± 12.8 versus 63.9 ± 38.9 days (P = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: Cases with a short first recurrence interval were more likely to experience a second recurrence. Repeated recurrences within a short time increased the likelihood of post-embolization recurrence. MMAE performed early following the initial surgical treatment increased the recurrence risk.