Journal of hepatology · 2020
Diverse effects of hepatic steatosis on fibrosis progression and functional cure in virologically quiescent chronic hepatitis B.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mak Lung-Yi, Hui Rex Wan-Hin, Fung James, Liu Fen, Wong Danny Ka-Ho, Cheung Ka-Shing, Yuen Man-Fung, Seto Wai-Kay
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Concomitant non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is common in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection, although its impact on liver-related outcomes remains controversial. We aimed to study the effect of hepatic steatosis on the risk of fibrosis progression and the likelihood of HBsAg seroclearance.
METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with CHB, normal alanine aminotransferase and low viraemia (serum HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml) were prospectively recruited for baseline and 3-year transient elastography assessment. Fibrosis staging was defined according to the EASL-ALEH guidelines, with fibrosis progression defined as ≥1 stage increment of fibrosis. Hepatic steatosis and severe hepatic steatosis were defined as controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) ≥248 dB/m and ≥280 dB/m, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 330 patients (median age 50.5 years, 41.2% male, median HBV DNA 189 IU/ml) were recruited. Twenty-two patients (6.7%) achieved HBsAg seroclearance during follow-up, and the presence of hepatic steatosis was associated with a significantly higher chance of HBsAg seroclearance (hazard ratio 3.246; 95% CI 1.278-8.243; p = 0.013). At baseline, 48.8% and 28.8% of patients had steatosis and severe steatosis, respectively, while 4.2% had F3/F4 fibrosis at baseline, increasing to 8.7% at 3 years. The rate of liver fibrosis progression in patients with persistent severe steatosis was higher than in those without steatosis (41.3% vs. 23%; p = 0.05). Persistent severe hepatic steatosis was independently associated with fibrosis progression (odds ratio 2.379; 95% CI 1.231-4.597; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: CAP measurements have predictive value in patients with virologically quiescent CHB. The presence of hepatic steatosis was associated with a higher risk of fibrosis progression but, paradoxically, a 3-fold increase in HBsAg seroclearance rate.
LAY SUMMARY: Co-existing fatty liver disease in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B infection leads to worsening liver fibrosis, but also increases the chance of cure from hepatitis B virus. Routine bedside assessment of liver fat content is important for risk assessment in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B.
METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with CHB, normal alanine aminotransferase and low viraemia (serum HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml) were prospectively recruited for baseline and 3-year transient elastography assessment. Fibrosis staging was defined according to the EASL-ALEH guidelines, with fibrosis progression defined as ≥1 stage increment of fibrosis. Hepatic steatosis and severe hepatic steatosis were defined as controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) ≥248 dB/m and ≥280 dB/m, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 330 patients (median age 50.5 years, 41.2% male, median HBV DNA 189 IU/ml) were recruited. Twenty-two patients (6.7%) achieved HBsAg seroclearance during follow-up, and the presence of hepatic steatosis was associated with a significantly higher chance of HBsAg seroclearance (hazard ratio 3.246; 95% CI 1.278-8.243; p = 0.013). At baseline, 48.8% and 28.8% of patients had steatosis and severe steatosis, respectively, while 4.2% had F3/F4 fibrosis at baseline, increasing to 8.7% at 3 years. The rate of liver fibrosis progression in patients with persistent severe steatosis was higher than in those without steatosis (41.3% vs. 23%; p = 0.05). Persistent severe hepatic steatosis was independently associated with fibrosis progression (odds ratio 2.379; 95% CI 1.231-4.597; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: CAP measurements have predictive value in patients with virologically quiescent CHB. The presence of hepatic steatosis was associated with a higher risk of fibrosis progression but, paradoxically, a 3-fold increase in HBsAg seroclearance rate.
LAY SUMMARY: Co-existing fatty liver disease in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B infection leads to worsening liver fibrosis, but also increases the chance of cure from hepatitis B virus. Routine bedside assessment of liver fat content is important for risk assessment in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B.