MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy · 2020

[A Case of Colorectal Cancer with Bladder Invasion Treated Ileal Neobladder for Urinary Bladder Replacement].

Okazaki Naoto, Kasahara Kenta, Watanabe Mitsuru, Wada Takahiro, Mazaki Junichi, Ishizaki Tetsuo, Enomoto Masanobu, Nagakawa Yuichi, Katsumata Kenji, Tsuchida Akihiko

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 56-year-old man presented to our hospital with melena, and was diagnosed as having locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer invading the trigone of the bladder(cT4bN0M0). mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab was administered as a preoperative chemotherapy. After 6 courses of administration, the main tumor shrunk but the bladder invasion remained. We explained to the patient that resection of the bladder was necessary for radical treatment of the tumor. As he refused a urostomy for urinary reconstruction, we chose ileal neobladder reconstruction and performed lower anterior resection plus total cystectomy, which resulted in pathologically curative resection. No recurrence and almost no urinary incontinence occurred during the 8 months after the operation. Although further follow-up is required, our present case indicates that ileal neobladder may be a useful reconstruction option for patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer who undergo total cystectomy.

Для цитирования: Okazaki Naoto, Kasahara Kenta, Watanabe Mitsuru, Wada Takahiro, Mazaki Junichi, Ishizaki Tetsuo, Enomoto Masanobu, Nagakawa Yuichi, Katsumata Kenji, Tsuchida Akihiko. [A Case of Colorectal Cancer with Bladder Invasion Treated Ileal Neobladder for Urinary Bladder Replacement].. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy. 2020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.