Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2020
CT reconstruction with thick slices not only underestimates lymph node size but also reduces data reproducibility in colorectal cancer.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Onuma Yurina, Tsuruta Chie, Okita Kenji, Hamabe Atsushi, Ogura Keishi, Takemasa Ichiro, Hatakenaka Masamitsu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Reliable size measurement of lymph node (LN) metastases is important for the evaluation of cancer treatment. However, image analyses without proper settings may result in inappropriate diagnoses and staging.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether reconstruction slice thickness in computed tomography (CT) affects measurements of LN size and reproducibility.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 48 patients with histological diagnoses of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced CT colonography as part of a surgical treatment preparation. A board-certified radiologist selected 106 LNs whose short-axis diameter was ≥5 mm on 1-mm-thick images; the short-axis diameters were measured on 1- and 5-mm-thick images by the radiologist and residents and compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Data variation and reproducibility were evaluated using the F test and Bland-Altman analysis. P<0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Short-axis diameters measured on 5-mm-thick images were significantly lower than those measured on 1-mm-thick images (P<0.01), even in the LNs whose short-axis diameters were over twice the slice thickness (P<0.05). Of the 106 LNs, 57 showed short-axis diameter <5 mm on 5-mm-thick images; the maximum short-axis diameter was 6.7 mm on a 1-mm thick image. Data variation was significantly larger on 5-mm thick images than 1-mm-thick images in small LNs (P<0.05) and reproducibility on 5-mm-thick images was inferior to that on 1-mm-thick images.
CONCLUSION: Thick reconstruction slices in CT can result in an underestimation of LN size and reduce data reproducibility. When measuring LN size, a thin reconstruction slice would be recommended based on targeted LN size.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether reconstruction slice thickness in computed tomography (CT) affects measurements of LN size and reproducibility.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 48 patients with histological diagnoses of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced CT colonography as part of a surgical treatment preparation. A board-certified radiologist selected 106 LNs whose short-axis diameter was ≥5 mm on 1-mm-thick images; the short-axis diameters were measured on 1- and 5-mm-thick images by the radiologist and residents and compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Data variation and reproducibility were evaluated using the F test and Bland-Altman analysis. P<0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Short-axis diameters measured on 5-mm-thick images were significantly lower than those measured on 1-mm-thick images (P<0.01), even in the LNs whose short-axis diameters were over twice the slice thickness (P<0.05). Of the 106 LNs, 57 showed short-axis diameter <5 mm on 5-mm-thick images; the maximum short-axis diameter was 6.7 mm on a 1-mm thick image. Data variation was significantly larger on 5-mm thick images than 1-mm-thick images in small LNs (P<0.05) and reproducibility on 5-mm-thick images was inferior to that on 1-mm-thick images.
CONCLUSION: Thick reconstruction slices in CT can result in an underestimation of LN size and reduce data reproducibility. When measuring LN size, a thin reconstruction slice would be recommended based on targeted LN size.