Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2014
Diagnostic algorithm of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kikuchi Daisuke, Hoteya Shu, Iizuka Toshiro, Kimura Ryusuke, Kaise Mitsuru
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: A novel diagnostic algorithm for magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADET) is needed because of diagnostic difficulties.
METHODS: In the present study, ME-NBI images taken prior to endoscopic treatment were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the relationship between ME-NBI findings and pathological findings. Lesions displaying a single surface pattern were classified as monotype, and those displaying multiple surface patterns as mixed type. Surface pattern was classified as preserved, micrified, or absent. In addition, vascular pattern was classified as absent, network, intrastructural vascular (ISV), or unclassified.
RESULTS: According to the revised Vienna classification, 100% (23/23) of mixed-type lesions were category 4/5 tumors, whereas approximately 50% (10/23) of monotype lesions were category 3 tumors. In the monotype lesions, the probability of category 4/5 tumor was 100% (2/2) in lesions with an unclassified vascular pattern, 64.3% (9/14) in lesions with an ISV pattern, 33.3% (1/3) in lesions with an absent pattern, and 25.0% (1/4) in lesions with a network pattern.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the possibility of developing an effective diagnostic algorithm for ME-NBI for SNADET by determining their surface pattern and vascular pattern.
METHODS: In the present study, ME-NBI images taken prior to endoscopic treatment were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the relationship between ME-NBI findings and pathological findings. Lesions displaying a single surface pattern were classified as monotype, and those displaying multiple surface patterns as mixed type. Surface pattern was classified as preserved, micrified, or absent. In addition, vascular pattern was classified as absent, network, intrastructural vascular (ISV), or unclassified.
RESULTS: According to the revised Vienna classification, 100% (23/23) of mixed-type lesions were category 4/5 tumors, whereas approximately 50% (10/23) of monotype lesions were category 3 tumors. In the monotype lesions, the probability of category 4/5 tumor was 100% (2/2) in lesions with an unclassified vascular pattern, 64.3% (9/14) in lesions with an ISV pattern, 33.3% (1/3) in lesions with an absent pattern, and 25.0% (1/4) in lesions with a network pattern.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the possibility of developing an effective diagnostic algorithm for ME-NBI for SNADET by determining their surface pattern and vascular pattern.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAlgorithmsAmpulla of VaterCarcinomaChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesDuodenal NeoplasmsDuodenoscopyFemaleHumansImage EnhancementIntestinal MucosaMaleMiddle AgedNarrow Band ImagingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStatistics, Nonparametric