The Orthopedic clinics of North America · 2009
Minimally invasive carpal tunnel release.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cellocco Paolo, Rossi Costantino, El Boustany Stefano, Di Tanna Gian Luca, Costanzo Giuseppe
Аннотация
We prospectively compared the safety and effectiveness of mini-incision (group A) and a limited open technique (group B) for carpal tunnel release (CTR) in 185 consecutive patients operated between November 1999 and May 2001, with a 5-year minimum follow-up. Patients in Group A had a minimally invasive approach (<2 cm incision), performed using the KnifeLight (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan) instrument. Patients in Group B had a limited longitudinal incision (3-4 cm). Patient status was evaluated with an Italian modified version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel questionnaire, administered preoperatively and at 19, 30, and 60 postoperative months. Mini-incision CTR showed advantages over standard technique in early recovery, pillar pain, and recurrence rate. The recovery period after mini-incision is shorter than after standard procedure.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarpal Tunnel SyndromeDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLigaments, ArticularMaleMedian NerveMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOrthopedic ProceduresPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome