Neurocritical care · 2020
New Approaches to Critical Illness Polyneuromyopathy: High-Resolution Neuromuscular Ultrasound Characteristics and Cytokine Profiling.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fisse Anna Lena, May Caroline, Motte Jeremias, Pedreiturria Xiomara, Breuer Thomas G K, Schneider-Gold Christiane, Marcus Katrin, Gold Ralf, Yoon Min-Suk, Pitarokoili Kalliopi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) is challenging. Pathogenesis of underlying critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM) remains incompletely understood. This exploratory study investigated whether longitudinal neuromuscular ultrasound examinations and cytokine analyses in correlation to classical clinical and electrophysiological assessment contribute to the understanding of CIPNM.
METHODS: Intensive care unit patients were examined every 7 days until discharge from hospital. Clinical status, nerve conduction studies, electromyography as well as ultrasound of peripheral nerves and tibial anterior muscle were performed. Cytokine levels were analyzed by a bead-based multiplex assay system.
RESULTS: Of 248 screened patients, 35 patients were included at median of 6 days (IQR: 8) after admission to intensive care unit. Axonal damage was the main feature of CIPNM. At the peak of CIPNM (7 days after inclusion), nerve ultrasound showed cross-sectional area increase of tibial nerve as a sign of inflammatory edema as well as hypoechoic nerves as a possible sign of inflammation. Cytokine analyses showed signs of monocyte and macrophage activation at this stage. Fourteen days after inclusion, cytokines indicated systemic immune response as well as profiles associated to neovascularization and regeneration.
CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory neuromuscular ultrasound and cytokine analyses showed signs of inflammation like macrophage and monocyte activation at the peak of CIPNM followed by a systemic immune response parallel to axonal damage. This underlines the role of both axonal damage and inflammation in pathogenesis of CIPNM.
METHODS: Intensive care unit patients were examined every 7 days until discharge from hospital. Clinical status, nerve conduction studies, electromyography as well as ultrasound of peripheral nerves and tibial anterior muscle were performed. Cytokine levels were analyzed by a bead-based multiplex assay system.
RESULTS: Of 248 screened patients, 35 patients were included at median of 6 days (IQR: 8) after admission to intensive care unit. Axonal damage was the main feature of CIPNM. At the peak of CIPNM (7 days after inclusion), nerve ultrasound showed cross-sectional area increase of tibial nerve as a sign of inflammatory edema as well as hypoechoic nerves as a possible sign of inflammation. Cytokine analyses showed signs of monocyte and macrophage activation at this stage. Fourteen days after inclusion, cytokines indicated systemic immune response as well as profiles associated to neovascularization and regeneration.
CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory neuromuscular ultrasound and cytokine analyses showed signs of inflammation like macrophage and monocyte activation at the peak of CIPNM followed by a systemic immune response parallel to axonal damage. This underlines the role of both axonal damage and inflammation in pathogenesis of CIPNM.