Oral radiology · 2025
Influence of enhancement filters on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions in radiographs obtained with a handheld X-ray unit.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ruiz Débora Costa, Oliveira Matheus L, Gaêta-Araujo Hugo, Freitas Deborah Queiroz, Haiter-Neto Francisco
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of enhancement filters on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions in radiographs obtained with a handheld X-ray unit.
METHODS: Radiographs of 40 human teeth exhibiting white spots or enamel discolorations were obtained with an Eagle X-ray handheld unit (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) configured at 2.5 mA, 60 kVp, and 0.45 s of exposure time. Two digital imaging systems (VistaScan and Digora Toto) were used for radiographic acquisition. A total of 12 enhancement filters--six available in each system--were applied to the radiographs. A total of five dentomaxillofacial radiologists blinded to the filtering condition independently evaluated the radiographs for the presence of caries lesions using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were determined based on the examiners' responses and were compared across the filters tested using one-way analysis of variance, with a significance level of 5%. The weighted Kappa index was used to assess both intra- and inter-examiner agreements in the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.
RESULTS: Applying the enhancement filters tested did not influence the diagnostic metrics of proximal caries lesions in radiographs obtained using a handheld X-ray unit (p > 0.05). While the intra-examiner agreements were substantial, the inter-examiner agreements ranged from fair to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: The enhancement filters available in the VistaScan and Digora Toto digital systems did not impact the diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries lesions in radiographs obtained using a handheld X-ray unit. Therefore, clinicians can apply these filters based on personal preference without compromising diagnostic reliability.
METHODS: Radiographs of 40 human teeth exhibiting white spots or enamel discolorations were obtained with an Eagle X-ray handheld unit (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) configured at 2.5 mA, 60 kVp, and 0.45 s of exposure time. Two digital imaging systems (VistaScan and Digora Toto) were used for radiographic acquisition. A total of 12 enhancement filters--six available in each system--were applied to the radiographs. A total of five dentomaxillofacial radiologists blinded to the filtering condition independently evaluated the radiographs for the presence of caries lesions using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were determined based on the examiners' responses and were compared across the filters tested using one-way analysis of variance, with a significance level of 5%. The weighted Kappa index was used to assess both intra- and inter-examiner agreements in the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.
RESULTS: Applying the enhancement filters tested did not influence the diagnostic metrics of proximal caries lesions in radiographs obtained using a handheld X-ray unit (p > 0.05). While the intra-examiner agreements were substantial, the inter-examiner agreements ranged from fair to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: The enhancement filters available in the VistaScan and Digora Toto digital systems did not impact the diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries lesions in radiographs obtained using a handheld X-ray unit. Therefore, clinicians can apply these filters based on personal preference without compromising diagnostic reliability.