Cancers · 2025
Café-Au-Lait Macules in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Birthmark or Biomarker?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Santangelo Andrea, Chelleri Cristina, Tomasino Marco, Pasquinucci Mattia, Cappozzo Francesca, Striano Pasquale, Diana Maria Cristina, Scala Marcello
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a rare multisystem disorder characterized by variable expressivity and increased tumor risk. Café-au-lait macules (CALMs) are a hallmark of the disease, often representing one of the earliest clinical manifestations and allowing a clinical NF1 diagnosis if six or more are present. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CALMs at birth in NF1 patients.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in patients aged ≥ 4 years presenting with CALMs at our Institution between 2020 and 2021, with a minimum follow-up of four years. We retrospectively collected data on CALMs at birth and other clinical manifestations associated with NF1.
RESULTS: Among 208 patients evaluated, including 147 with a confirmed diagnosis of NF1, 110 did not show CALMs at birth, and 98 had at least one. The absence of CALMs at birth did not correlate with a lower likelihood of NF1. In contrast, the CALM number at birth directly correlated with the likelihood of NF1, up to 95% in patients with ≥5 macules. Additionally, a higher number of CALMs correlated with a greater prevalence of plexiform neurofibromas (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a higher number of CALMs may indicate a more severe form of NF1, with an increased risk of plexiform neurofibromas. These results emphasize the importance of a comprehensive evaluation of patients with CALMs, especially in case of multiple lesions, aiming at implementing early NF1 diagnosis, follow-up strategies, and overall patient management.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in patients aged ≥ 4 years presenting with CALMs at our Institution between 2020 and 2021, with a minimum follow-up of four years. We retrospectively collected data on CALMs at birth and other clinical manifestations associated with NF1.
RESULTS: Among 208 patients evaluated, including 147 with a confirmed diagnosis of NF1, 110 did not show CALMs at birth, and 98 had at least one. The absence of CALMs at birth did not correlate with a lower likelihood of NF1. In contrast, the CALM number at birth directly correlated with the likelihood of NF1, up to 95% in patients with ≥5 macules. Additionally, a higher number of CALMs correlated with a greater prevalence of plexiform neurofibromas (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a higher number of CALMs may indicate a more severe form of NF1, with an increased risk of plexiform neurofibromas. These results emphasize the importance of a comprehensive evaluation of patients with CALMs, especially in case of multiple lesions, aiming at implementing early NF1 diagnosis, follow-up strategies, and overall patient management.