Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2001
Ten-year combination treatment with colchicine and ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on symptomatic patients.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Battezzati P M, Zuin M, Crosignani A, Allocca M, Invernizzi P, Selmi C, Villa E, Podda M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Combined medical treatment may provide further benefit to primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients administered ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).
AIM: To evaluate the long-term effects of colchicine and UDCA in symptomatic PBC patients.
PATIENTS/METHODS: We extended up to 10 years the double-blind treatment of 44 symptomatic PBC patients originally included in a 3-year multicentre study comparing UDCA and colchicine (U + C) versus UDCA and placebo (U + P). Outcome measures were death or liver transplantation; incidence of clinically relevant events; clinical and quantitative variables retaining prognostic information.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 7 +/- 3 years. One patient was lost, three withdrew because of jaundice (U + P); two patients stopped colchicine but remained on UDCA. Eleven patients (two for liver-unrelated reasons, U + P) and six patients (U + C) died, three and two patients, respectively, were transplanted (incidence rate difference, five cases per 100 patient-years; 95% CI, -1 to 11). Hepatocellular carcinoma developed in one (U + P) and four (U + C) patients (difference, -2; CI, -5 to 1), portal hypertension complications in nine patients from each group (difference, 1; CI, -5 to 6). Trends of serum bilirubin, Mayo score, antipyrine clearance were similar among treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic PBC patients, colchicine does not offer additional benefits to UDCA. In this population, UDCA does not obviate disease progression.
AIM: To evaluate the long-term effects of colchicine and UDCA in symptomatic PBC patients.
PATIENTS/METHODS: We extended up to 10 years the double-blind treatment of 44 symptomatic PBC patients originally included in a 3-year multicentre study comparing UDCA and colchicine (U + C) versus UDCA and placebo (U + P). Outcome measures were death or liver transplantation; incidence of clinically relevant events; clinical and quantitative variables retaining prognostic information.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 7 +/- 3 years. One patient was lost, three withdrew because of jaundice (U + P); two patients stopped colchicine but remained on UDCA. Eleven patients (two for liver-unrelated reasons, U + P) and six patients (U + C) died, three and two patients, respectively, were transplanted (incidence rate difference, five cases per 100 patient-years; 95% CI, -1 to 11). Hepatocellular carcinoma developed in one (U + P) and four (U + C) patients (difference, -2; CI, -5 to 1), portal hypertension complications in nine patients from each group (difference, 1; CI, -5 to 6). Trends of serum bilirubin, Mayo score, antipyrine clearance were similar among treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic PBC patients, colchicine does not offer additional benefits to UDCA. In this population, UDCA does not obviate disease progression.